• Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 minutes ago

    O he will eventually, make mistake. Longer he is allowed to be the tyrant he wants to be, all of his ‘threats’ are very real

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I always assumed America would swiftly deal with a racist fascist criminal megalomaniac.

    Boy was I wrong.

    This nation is WEAK.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      51 minutes ago

      Well instead of dealing with their fascist problem after WWII, they decided to repress (and sometimes kill) the most reliable antifascists - the leftists.

      That said some countries that objectively did purge their fasists seem to still have that problem today. Perhaps the theory that capitalism creates fascism as it declines predicts this.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        Capitalism creates an environment of fear and danger and promotes of level of individual responsibility that alienates people from everyone else. Even people who are well off today are afraid of losing advantages and being hung out to dry by the very same uncaring system they keep supporting.

    • iThinkDifferentThanU@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      just no one is gonna be there like for Luigi, if we Americans had any balls he’d either be out of jail or someone broke him out, no balls, especially if you’re a dumb fuck Republican, hey trump imma shit on your grave you orange POS, come get me, boom shaka laka

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Why would they deal with racists? USA as a whole never stopped being racist.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Trump always had this knack of revealing his intentions when he thought he could just hit back at people.

    That’s nothing new.

    But what he reveals is indeed getting worse every day, or at least: every day of 2025 it is much worse than before that.

    This, ladies and germs, is narcissistic dictatorial megalomania. Let’s hope it he won’t last long.

  • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Trump is using the “bully pulpit” to bully people out of their constitutional rights.

  • Hux@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    6 hours ago

    BREAKING NEWS: “President Cunt Cuntily Says Some Cunty Shit”

    ALSO: “European Union Stockpiling ScotchGuard Reserves in Anticipation of Future JD Vance Visit”

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    7 hours ago

    There was period of time during Trump’s last administration where the world just got so crazy I had a collection of screenshots of “not the onion” headlines that just seemed too insane to be real.

    I remember one was like “Judge determines woman can’t prove she didn’t want to be set on fire.”

    This would fit in nicely.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Huh…I’m trying to think of what legal defense you could give to PROVE you didn’t want to be set on fire.

      I can’t think of one. What do you say that proves it? Which means I get how that headline happened, but also…how did THAT headline happen???

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Most of the time when weird questions like that involving consent come up, I assume it probably involved some kind of sex thing.

      • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The only thing I can think of is that there was some sort of event where other people were being willingly set on fire. Like if were some sort of performance that went wrong, I could see there being a reasonable defense that the performer didn’t know she didn’t want to participate.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Oh remember restaurants? So lovely how it used to be you know. The restaurants. Of course they were shut down by the terrible crime and the covid.

        Of course I’m a very good driver . . . yeah. Uh oh. Fart.