The Department of Homeland Security has escalated its clash with so-called sanctuary states this week, warning California, New York, and Illinois in letters obtained by CBS News that refusal to honor immigration detainers could trigger federal legal action.

In letters dated Sept. 10, Acting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director Todd Lyons ordered the attorneys general of the three states to declare within two days whether they would comply with “thousands of ICE detainers” lodged against individuals in state custody, according to DHS. Immigration detainers are formal requests by ICE asking local jails and prisons to notify the agency before releasing an individual, and to hold them briefly so federal agents can take undocumented migrants into federal custody.

  • DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    If the federal government withholds tax dollars, remember those are your tax dollars, so pay them to your state instead. You don’t need the federal government especially if they are going to steal.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well if alligator Auschwitz can just lose track of hundreds of prisoners I don’t know why these states couldn’t accidentally lose track of detainees as well

      • 5too@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The only problem I see is, smuggle them to where? For the immigrants, this was supposed to be their sanctuary; for the others, the US isn’t (yet) classified as a country you can seek asylum from.

        Individuals might have someplace safe outside the country they could flee to, but I don’t see anyplace that could handle them en masse yet

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why believe the federal government on their threats?

    You’re damned if you do … and damned if you don’t

    It’s the same thing that happens when the mafia start threatening everyone with breaking knees if you don’t just give up all your money all the time … eventually people figure out that it’s better to fight back because your going to lose your knees anyway.

    There’s a reason why the mafia balance their threats … they want to keep people afraid enough to give up some of their money all the time … rather than be constantly and perpetually afraid to the point where people will just get suicidal and make you no money at all.

  • pahlimur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s not legal in Oregon to do this, the state isn’t allowed to use resources to help with immigration enforcement. Also why Oregon is considered a sanctuary state.

  • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    While hating ICE as much as the next commenter… What if we did?

    Seriously, bringing the state into the mix could establish proper paper trails, log activity, ensure access to legal representation, verify warrants, and uphold laws so frequently violated by Trump’s Gestapo.

    Sort of a malicious compliance thing if the Fed is twisting your arm.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      The second they’re in custody of ICE they virtually disappear. At best it reinforces the narrative that these aren’t hardened criminals being picked up, but anyone with half a brain already knew that.

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I think there’s a movie about that. Schindler’s List I think.

      I haven’t actually watched it though so I’m not sure.

    • Xaphanos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I like this. Agent names, chain of custody, evidence locker, mandatory body cams, the works.

    • frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The problem is many local budgets are strapped for cash, they’d have to ignore services they actually need to do in order to implement something like this.

  • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    The biggest charge will be embezzlement. Right in plan sight. Crypto, government contracts, and errors will be it. Can’t wait for the pitch forks and torches.