• Burray_Mookchin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    It’s insulting that this guy says 70k like it’s a low salary (for “kids” as he says). I make a quarter of that. I also know a lot more retired old people who never made close to that in their lifetime than ones who did make that much

    And if I did make that much it would still feel insulting because I’m pretty sure most people making 70k can easily afford weekly $28 lunches…

    Edit: Just saw that this motherfucker is wearing two expensive watches on the photo… absolutely repulsive person

    • krisevol@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      Adjusted for inflation the average worker in the 80’s and 90’s made way more than 70k a yr. I made 60k in 2000, that’s $120k today.

      • Burray_Mookchin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah the fact that the wages are stagnating is another thing, I’m just saying from where me and most of the people of all ages in my life are standing, 70k is a lot.

        • krisevol@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Depends on the city you live in and your situation. Single in a small town 70k good. Family of 4 in the city and you wouldn’t even qualify for a home loan and are probably in assistance.

          • Burray_Mookchin@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            70k is 3,5k/mo after taxes in my country. Doesnt really matter where you live with that you could be paying 2500 in rent and still be loaded for the month. Look all I’m saying is this O’Leary guy is a fucking prick and most people never see 70k in their lifetime

            • krisevol@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              You say “loaded” but you wouldn’t be able to pay for college without debt, wouldn’t be able to buy a house, wouldn’t be able to afford to retire, or save much, couldn’t afford vacations, and couldn’t even afford a new economy car.

              That isn’t loaded, that’s being poor.

                • DrMorose@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  This is exactly what is expected to happen. People complaining/arguing but not complaining/arguing about the correct issue.

                  70k by everyone’s standards other than the top 1% is a lot of money, because we have always had to focus on surviving and can make that amount work. Life isnt going to be roses, but it will be life. It really does come down to buying power, but also priority. Back in the 70/80s buying tech (tvs, computers) was insanely expensive. Now you can pick up a 65in for like 200usd. Back in the 90s a new car was under 10k. Now a decent car bought new is 35/40k. Housing…I am not even going to touch it. I bought a 5 bedroom 2400sq ft for 89k in PA in the early 2000s, now that house on zillow is 350k. I only had it a year and I sold it for 85k after closing and everything. Prices for things have flipped for a lot of items that used to be luxury compared to necessity. That’s how we can afford avocado toast because we can only afford eggs/bread/ and a single avocado.

                  I dont want to start a 2nd argument, and I am not confident I am getting my point across. I just feel all that are here arguing should not be arguing amongst ourselves since we are essentially in the same boat amd should be putting our efforts at the real issue.

    • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      A lot of older folks made more than 70k by a fair margin when you account for buying power and quality of life.

      You have to adjust numbers for more then just inflation if you want a remotely accurate comparison.

  • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’ve seen this argument from people before, with avocado toast and Starbucks and everything else, but no one seems to ask why lunch is $28 or blame the people charging $28 for lunch as part of the problem

    • WanderWisley@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      This is the new avocado toast slur that boomers are gonna use to describe the younger generations lack of not being able to afford anything.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 days ago

    Wait is $70,000 a year a low amount of money? That’s an insane amount of money to be considered poor.

    • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      70k is basically living in the streets in a chunk of America while a few places it’s living like a king.

      But those places are quickly going away.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      The average income is around $84,000, so if you are making less, your employer is fucking you over. The difference between your income and $84,000, is what your employer stole from you and called “Profit.”

  • redwattlebird@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    If I’ve read all the past posts from people in the USA correctly, it’s not lunch that’s expensive but the healthcare to stay alive.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      This. I’m paying nearly $500 a month for shitty insurance that I literally can’t afford the co-pays to actually use. I would literally just go uninsured if my employer weren’t reimbursing me for the premium. It’s functionally the same thing.

      • tmyakal@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        I haven’t seen a doctor in over 20 years. I didn’t have insurance for most of that time. I’ve finally had insurance in the last five years or so, but now I can’t find a doctor my insurance covers that is taking new patients.

      • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I work at a hospital that provides hospital based insurance for their employees. I paid more in copays to use their Physical Therapy staffed by PT students than it was to go to a local out of network PT place.

        They still couldn’t determine exactly how I injured my knee not how to help. This, in addition to all the steps it took to get to the Rehab referral aspect wiped out 2 years of my FSA

  • Nalivai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    If you eat 28 lunch 3 times a day every day it will be $30660 per year. $30660 a year will not make you not poor in most of America, so might as well eat well.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      $30k extra would make a huge difference, though. I get the point you’re trying to make, but your example is flawed. People shouldn’t have to choose between eating well and not having to work until they die. A more effective way to re-frame this would be “Why does lunch cost $28?”

      • Nalivai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        would make a huge difference

        would make jack fuck. If there is no inflation (lol) and you want to scrounge enough money to have something to just about survive, you can start saving 30k per year right now, and in 53 years you will meet your goal.
        The realistic question is “will I be alive in 53 years” and realistic answer for most of us is “what the fuck of course no”. But if you’re a toddler and have some stupid ideas about the existance of the future still, then yeah, you could start asking why does lunch costs $28, or why do you need to not eat now to eat later, shouldn’t be there some smarter system about it.

        • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Sounds like you know fuck all about finance. “If there’s no inflation.” Uh, yeah. That 30k a year is beating inflation by a LOT in any sort of investment.

          • Nalivai@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I didn’t want to calculate compound interests and whatever the fuck else. It doesn’t matter, if it’s 53 years, 60 years or 40 years. If you stop eating now so you can start eating in 40 years, your life wasn’t worth living anyway.

    • krisevol@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      That is your retirement right there. Plug those numbers into a retirement calculator.

      Was it worth it?

      • Nalivai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        If you don’t afford yourself good things, and don’t spend any money, you can remove it from the economy so when you’re old and can’t work anymore, you can fight with billionaires to get a portion of that money back so you can afford one instance of medical help.
        Who am I kidding, there will be no medical care by the time you retire.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    What we need to understand about O’Leary is that:

    a) He likely has an incredibly tiny penis.

    and b) He is absolutely desperate to be seen in the same circle as the likes of Musk, Zuck, Gates, Bezos, etc…

    The reality is that his wealth pales incomparison to those guys, at roughly 150 million. To them, he’s as much a pauper as you and i are. He’s a nobody. And that fucking grinds at him that he’s not a part of the cool kids club. It gnaws at his insides that, in reality, the people above him AND the people below him would literally not give a shit if he fucked off back to Canada and died in obscurity.

    For all of their evil, the group that O’Leary desperately wants to be seen as equal to will at least leave some sort of Legacy. They’ll at least be remembered in the history books, even if just a footnote about their shitty shenanigans.

    O’Leary will be forgotten as soon as he’s in the ground. Probably sooner.

    That’s why he’s suddenly forcing himself into every fucking news program, and awards shows, and trying to strike deals for massive data centers that no one wants. Because he’s a sad and pathetic old man afraid of being forgotten.

    also, did I mention he has an incredibly tiny penis?

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      You know who else has tiny/no penis? Half the population. If you want to criticize this annoying cunt, use facts.

      1. He misrepresented himself on Canadian Sharktank for three seasons as making his money off a $3B deal with Mattel. It was only in season 4 he was outed as having no equity in that deal. The deal eventually made Mattel -$3B.

      2. He started the O’Leary fund off his Sharktank brand. It under performed every year and eventually got sold at a loss. Everyone lost. Every call he made was a loser.

      3. In 2019, O’Leary and his wife were speeding on a boat across a lake at night, when they hit another boat and killed two people. Unclear who was driving the boat, police did not check sobriety. O’Leary settled in a secret settlement. O’Leary and wife got off in criminal court. After killing two people, O’Leary sued the victims for $3M but the case was not won.

      Thankfully, this piece of shit moved to Boston.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      If you’re a hit man, you should be making more than that. Unless you’re trying to be a working class hitman, righting wrongs for the little guy, like Luigi.

  • ShankShill@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    At this point, many people should just game the system to get a decent living.

    2 bedroom apartments cost what a mortgage can cost for a 4 bedroom new house in some places. Got a very trustworthy friend with good credit? Pay them for “housekeeping” while the only thing they’re cleaning out is the beer in the fridge while playing vidyagames. Let them show extra income and get a house. Be roommates. Have other roommates join in. Everyone hoard money while having cheap living in a nice new place.

    Is that fraud? Idk but I’m in a nice new house and hoarding money.

    • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      … you’re sort of just describing a housing co-op.

      Except that instead of it being a “particularly trustworthy friend” it’s a legal entity that everyone paying into has voting rights for.