• AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is really bad even just from the perspective of user behavior. Training people to scan QR codes from anything that looks like a captcha box is HORRIBLE for security.

    “Thanks for scanning the code, just one more step! Please input your phone number, and type in the code you receive.”

    Boom, account stolen.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    If google requires me to permit other companies to leech all my personal data to be able to use anything on the Internet at all, I say we label Google, Microsoft, Apple as criminal organizations

    I’m sorry, bit there have to be limits.

    I. DO. NOT. WANT. TO. USE. ANYTHING. GOOGLE.

    OR APPLE. OR MICROSOFT.

    FUCK ALL THESE OLIGARCH COMPANIES INTO THE GROUND

    I do not want my private data leeches and sold every day, I don’t even get paid for it

    • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      What they are doing is way worse tban what you understood.

      These QR codes will show on your Desktop PC and you will need an Android phone or an iOS device with a logged in Google QR code app to get past it.

        • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ayup that has been the holy grail of big tech.

          They are most of the way there today. Make Identity Resolution inescapable. Bing bang boom.

          It is more than just phones and lappys too. It’s everything. That smart TV. That fitness watch. That automobile. That streaming music service. The ebook reader you got as a birthday gift.

          Your behavior across every single device is data gold. This is today’s reality.

      • Phantaloons@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Guess I’m not going to Youtube, then.

        I see a future where we have our mandated government ID shitphone for banking, corpo and government suchn’shit, and the laptop we access Anna’s, Yggdrasil and TOR with.

        and the days go by!

        Not exactly same as it ever was, but seems kinda 2007 to me. I doubt any Lemmy instance or i2p site will enforce Google’s QRcode spy-proxy.

        • ferrule@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          My current GraphineOS phone will probably be my last smartphone. I’ll be moving to a dumb phone and a data hotspot connected to some type of cyberdeck. Will have that thing locked down, blocking known abusive companies like Google. Honestly could care less about using any service that touches them.

          • Mercer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            But texting and calli g without signal is so unsecure. Unless you have a reliable source of burner phones and sims

            • ferrule@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              I almost never call and I don’t use SMS so its mostly a last ditch effort thing. The hotspot+cyberdeck will be my main means of communication.

      • kalpol@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I wouldn’t scan shit from a website. Random QR codes are a security risk. Just won’t visit that website.

        • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s why you have to use the special google app that will protect you from all these dangers*

          *and also collect all your data, sell it to advertisers and forward it to US surveillance agencies (for your own protection of course).

          • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Sad thing is, that argument works against so many ppl. “I can trust this app. It’s from Google!”

            We(*) are tearing down personal computing. Brick by brick. The very idea of controling our own devs is getting lost. Replacing with Big Tech Feudalism.

            (*) Not most of us here. But in the whole pop.

    • bagsy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Every company that uses these captcha service should also be fined so hard. This isnt just google here.

      • jafra@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        And every company that is relying on gsm or the apple pendant to verify anything.

  • ISOmorph@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    That would only make me install Graphene even harder if I wasn’t already writing from a phone with it

    • Pirate2377@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Hopefully this will push Linux Mobile development so that we are no longer completely bound to Android or iOS

  • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    This does seem to work with sandboxed Google Play Services on GrapheneOS btw.

    I scanned the demo QR code on Google’s talk page about it with sandboxed Play Services enabled and it gave me a custom popup asking if I’d like to verify.

  • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    For a decade or two now, it’s been pretty much assumed that everyone has an internet-connected, camera-equipped, browser-capable device in their pocket. Restaurants, banks, hospitals, employers and even government offices use QR codes and websites to get you to their menus, forms or services.

    If ID is being tied to my mobile spy device, then I need my mobile spy device to be a right and not a luxury. $40-50 for a few years of validity, internet access provided at no cost, even if slow. I can have my luxury phone be where I’m ‘anonymous’, but I want the government to subsidize the mobile spy device if it’s a mandatory expense. Even cheap phones cost a lot of money.

    To be clear, I don’t want ID tied to my phone, but it’s gotten harder to exist without one, so it should be something we have access to with minimal friction.

    Add food, water and shelter to that list, but you can’t ask for them without a web browser.

  • Geodes & Gems@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Smartphones are such an utter wretch nowadays, & I’m not even sure if there was a time they weren’t. I don’t get the appeal of a smartphone, they do everything a dumbphone does but worse, more expensive & with an unremovable thick layer of scum, yeah a smartphone has some of the features of a laptop or desktop but who needs that baked into their phone for every moment?

    People are trying so hard to fix smartphones (even by giving money to the least privacy respecting companies ever by buying Google phones) when they can get a dumbphone and be rid of those problems in the first place. Well that’s my opinion at least, I think it might be a bit extreme.

    • destiper@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The “root of bad” is capitalism itself, the logic of the system tends to create monopolies over time, as demonstrated in the game ‘Monopoly’

      • FluorideMind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Capitalism is fine small scale, most systems are. Humans are just wired for efficiency and so with every player on the same board the most ruthless player wins.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ah yes, the mythical small business capitalism we all hear about. I will agree it sounds good on paper and also seems to distribute money in a somewhat efficient manner.

          Unfortunately there has never been a government able to regulate and keep capitalism this way. Other people have said it is simply not possible due to the nature of capitalism.

          I think there is a worthwhile debate here around systems and culture. Perhaps capitalism could work if people were not inherently so greedy. I tend to believe that culture is the deciding factor which is a little disheartening honestly.

          • zqps@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s not just culture. Most people value community and the well-being of others above amassing wealth (provided their needs are met). The problem is that capitalism indoctrinates us against those values, and even more that it rewards and empowers those who don’t share them at all.

            • eldavi@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              @Doomsider@lemmy.world

              Unfortunately there has never been a government able to regulate and keep capitalism this way. Other people have said it is simply not possible due to the nature of capitalism.

              the primary “authoritarian” government of the world has proven that it is possible and that keeping them under a tight leash is the only way to prevent them from indoctrinating the masses; that’s why the number of billions and the wealth of the its millionaires have been steadily declining for the last decade or so, while simultaneously continuing to improve the quality of life for its citizens; meanwhile while the united states is poised to get its first trillionaire class very soon.

              • Doomsider@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                I sure hope you are not talking about China as they have produced more billionaires than the US for the last two years dramatically increasing their income gap. If you think they have capitalism in check I have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn.

                • eldavi@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  you’re not wrong – china’s billionaire count is up. but here’s the cycle that people in the west miss: a new crop of billionaires come along (eg. tech, evs, ai) and they replace the old crop (eg. real estate & manufacturing) that the chinese gov’t already short-leashed, and boom, numbers jumped.

                  that new crop will experience their own slowdown too once they get their own short-leashes like the previous crop did. it happened around 2018-2024, and it’ll happen again and again. china’s churn is fast, but the pattern’s the same every time: rise, stall, replace; no permanent footing/beachhead for a billionaire class from which to capture the system or spread misinformation like it is in the united states.

      • mcv@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s the love of money that’s the root of all evil, according to Jesus, but yeah, that’s the driving force behind capitalism.

        • magnetosphere@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s the love of money that’s the root of all evil

          Thank you for getting this quote right. Often, it’s shortened to “money is the root of all evil”, which hits different, and removes the element of personal responsibility. The “love of money” bit is important.

  • Batmorous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    We seriously need to ask Valve to make SteamOS phones.

    Not only will they be good for gaming but imagine being able to put other OS’es on it like PC’s. Bazzite, PostmarketOS, etc. Plus Valve will still get revenue from people using the upcoming Steam ARM Game Store, and the current Bannerhub/Gamenative community android apps that enable playing PC games they own from Steam/GOG on Phones

    Its such a huge opportunity that we all should be encouraging then to pursue now and after they release their current 3 big projects: Steam Controllers, Steam Machines, Steam Frames

      • Batmorous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I get where you are coming from. Out of all of the billionaires he is one that is one of the least bad out of the rest of them, and is doing plenty of good things himself. He got that wealth from Steam doing so well over the years co.pared to other billionaires that did the shadiest things imaginable

        I don’t agree with his yachts business yet I agree with his side project of making boats specifically for ocean research. I don’t agree with him still getting paid so much today, yet I agree that he pays and treats his employees and customers well

        End of the day it’s another option to get open phones that can have bootloader unlocked to change OS, and not be locked down. It is good to have more options currently where there are few.

        Many online PC gamers have this opinion too so overall its more so a matter of time and comes down to if Valve really wants to then they will.

        • eronth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah he’s the kind of wealth that helps you realize why people ever supported the wealthy. They used to actually have an understanding that keeping their wealth meant keeping employees, customers, and people at large happy and safe – and they’d be willing to put in the effort (or rather, money) to ensure it.

  • meowmeow@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Can we trust that isn’t a campaign to promote Google? What are these websites? Why aren’t they blocking an iPhone? Can any of that be replicated or is this just a Google campaign to create fear and doubt

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      GrapheneOS user here! Not sure about websites but there are certain apps that don’t work properly without Google Play Services, but Graphene’s app store has a sandboxed version of it, so I just installed that and revoked all it’s permissions. Then if an app needs it, I just turn on the relevant permission, do the thing and then turn permissions off again. It’s a bit of a pain at first but I’m used to it now.

    • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      What do you plan to do? Dumbphone? No phone? Break glass in case of emergency phone in a faraday pouch?

      I’m considering a break-glass dumbphone in a faraday pouch. I REALLY fucking hate location tracking. I’d keep it seperate from my IRL ID. Prob is, it’s hard. Screw up once, big data pounces. One call tied to your name in any way. One friend puts it in their contacts. One time to forget the pouch and there’s a location ping at your residence. Not to mention the difficulty of even buying it and setting up a plan. Ugh :(

      • belunos@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m a teams app for dumb phones away from getting off smart phones. I’m fiddy and have to use my readers to even see my phone, so I’ve slowly stopped using it for much outside of random apps for appliances. I can get an ipad for that, though. I’m also a privacy advocate, but I’ve made peace with the fact that ship has pretty much sailed

  • Freakazoid@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Let’s hope the EU prevents this from happening. We should be able to access every site we wish without Google’s permission.

    • eleitl@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The EU is busily building the Fourth Reich, so don’t expect help from there.

        • Narri N. (they/them)@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          The ongoing battle against online privacy is a symptom of capitalism, the EU is a capitalist state. The only thing the EU would ever do against US-based capitalism is to gobble up those capital gains for themselves. It doesn’t matter if it happes or not, the privacy-issues for end-users would never be alleviated by the EU.

          • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            From what you’re saying, they would’ve already introduced all those capitalist methods of control the first time around.

            Which they didn’t.

            What gives?

            Also: the EU is literally incapable of “gobbling up capital gains for themselves” because “themselves” doesn’t exist in this context - the EU is not a “State”. The member-states might (and some do).