• abc@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I considered buying it when the IPO was but didn’t.

    Now I’m looking at the comments here and I’m thinking that perhaps now is the time. Lemmy is usually the number one investment source. Just do the exact opposite what people are saying here and you’ll be rich.

  • Folstar@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    21 hours ago

    We ain’t seen nothing yet. In 2-3 weeks the Q2 report will release at which 20% of stocks held by employees will be unlocked, which has hit even profitable and not-fantasy-based companies hard in the past. There will also be a wave of resignations from people who cash out and if that takes key people then investors back off even further. My guess is fElon wants the stock to stay high until next summer when he can sell, but he NEEDS it to stay high until November when early investors can cash out. He has borrowed billions from people you wouldn’t want to owe $1 and been delaying and juggling for a few years with tacking together this SpaceX nonsense amalgamation.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      In 2-3 weeks the Q2 report will release at which 20% of stocks held by employees will be unlocked, which has hit even profitable and not-fantasy-based companies hard in the past.

      When you consider the kind of life changing amounts of money even a few thousand shares sell for at current rates, they’d be crazy not to.

      My guess is fElon wants the stock to stay high until next summer when he can sell, but he NEEDS it to stay high until November when early investors can cash out

      It’s fallen maybe 12% since the IPO. You’re talking about shares that were trading for a few bucks during the original debt offerings. Marc Andressen has something like a 6000% ROI on his holdings even at current prices.

      If this company dropped by 50%, it would still be worth in the $800B range. There’s no world in which current shareholders don’t make fuckoff amounts of profit. The only question is whether we’re talking nine figures or ten.

      • Folstar@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        50% might prove optimistic. The rules that were bent for SpaceX exist for reasons. The August dump will be 4X the shares already in the wild. You are right, employees would be crazy not to sell at current rates. SpaceX employees are probably smart and/or educated enough to read the white papers on all these science fantasy projects and know they are pure fantasy. Cool stuff to fire up investment bros, but not the kind of thing they want to be tasked with trying to make reality. Point being, the floor for what an employee would not sale is going to be really low. True believers might hold, but anyone who smells the BS or just likes money will gleefully sell at 50% of current.

        Meanwhile, China is making great strides in VTVL and much cheaper, open source LLMs. The EU is eager to find home grown or at the least not-American tech solutions. Every headline makes SpaceX look less and less likely to make ANY profits, let alone completely dominate supposedly multi-trillion dollar markets.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 hours ago

          SpaceX employees are probably not happy about being used as a dumping ground for an AI black hole company. I expect many are counting the days until they can leave.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          The August dump will be 4X the shares already in the wild.

          So, from 1% of market cap to 2%?

          Spread over shareholders who still hold north of 90% of the company?

          Meanwhile, China is making great strides in VTVL and much cheaper, open source LLMs. The EU is eager to find home grown or at the least not-American tech solutions.

          China (and India and Brazil, among others) are all making huge investments in aerospace. The EU is certainly making a lot of noise, but because everything is privatized to fuck, what you’re left with is guess like Richard Branson paddin wallets while programs like the FCAS flounder.

          Every headline makes SpaceX look less and less likely to make ANY profits

          Starlink is still the modern word in satellite communication. That’s worth a few hundred billion on it’s face.

          Will this advantage last? Idk. Probably not, but maybe.

          At a minimum, if you want to be friendly with America, you’ll need to buy from Musk.

          • Folstar@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Starlink, which is nowhere near worth that much even under a best case scenario (compare to other comm companies), can make money and SpaceX still not make any profits because of the the xAI money pit. Also, no, the advantage will not last. The last 30 years of satellite communications have been one seemingly promising idea after another that fizzled out or was made obsolete. No reason to think that trend will change now, especially not when the Starlink model is extremely resource intensive.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Starlink, which is nowhere near worth that much even under a best case scenario

              The existing network plus whatever Elon Musk can launch in the next twenty years, assuming an absence of competition could be a trillion dollar company. When you’ve got a monopoly on military satellite technology in a market full of warring super states, that’s a lot of economic leverage.

              I’m deeply skeptical that he’ll have that edge for long. But I can at least interesting someone who thinks it’s worth a gamble.

              • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Who is going to pay the money for there to be a reasonable return on that value? I don’t have Starlink, I have no need for it, since there’s a cable coming into where I live. Sure there’s people that live in remote places that it’s useful for. But that’s not a lot of people.

                There are military applications, but Musk is a flake not military wants to be dependent on him. Every country in the world is spending a lot of money to end their dependence on the US defense industrial complex, so there will be alternatives for military purposes.

                Maybe it can work in vehicles? But if the price is too high people will just use 5G or just go without access for a while.

                Starlink is just a product to fill in some edge cases. It will probably make a steady profit, but there will be competition from Europe and China before too long.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  Who is going to pay the money for there to be a reasonable return on that value?

                  Government militaries, mostly. The Pentagon and it’s NATO allies, militaries across the Pacific Rim, Ukraine, etc.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Is that going to be 20% of stock held by each employee can be sold, or 20% of employees can sell their stock?

      If it’s the latter then yes, I can see them cashing out and leaving.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s because it was severely over valued for a company that produces no product and makes no profit.

    To be fair it was a solid pump and dump.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      You mean creating a worldwide communication system that has to be completely relaunched every half decade that is the exact opposite of profitable isn’t sustainable!?

      • weew@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Actually the Starlink division itself is profitable.

        The unprofitable part is Twitter and xAI which got merged in right before the IPO.

        SpaceX was actually on the path to being quite profitable, but then Musk tried to hide his two biggest money sinks inside it.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Profitable like Tesla? That is not actually profitable without a big chunk (like a third) of their money from government subsidies.

          https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/117956/documents/HMKP-119-JU00-20250226-SD003.pdf

          It appears SpaceX may not be as highly leveraged with the government with only 20% of its total revenue from government contracts.

          It is interesting to look this up but ultimately what I mean is long term profitability considering they will have to continuously replace their satellites every 5-10 years.

          The combining of his companies is a whole other level of fuckery that regulators should have smacked down instantly, but you know reality.

    • Faithless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Sadly Here, hé is not a loser. Things happened exactly the way he wanted to. He won big, his idiot fans lost bigger

      • NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I wont dispute that he certainly benefited from being able to buy entire countries and pay off any regulatory agency he didnt go at with an axe, but I think we all lost out as a result, not just his fanboys

  • kmirl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    152
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t know how anyone fell for this pump and dump scheme in the first place.

      • hayvan@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        That’s the most outrageous part. The most obviously fraudulent company being given fast track to s&p 500 (although I just read that decision was overturned) NASDAQ100 just reeks of corruption.

        EDIT: thanks for the correction. I don’t know much about USA or their economic stuff.

        • Sir. Haxalot@nord.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          1 day ago

          It was NASDAQ100 that let SpaceX in. S&P 500 stayed true to their rules which includes waiting at least 1 year after IPO to include it in the portfolio

      • mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        83
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean you choose your investments for your 401(k). Maybe it is time to learn about which funds you’re invested in and make sure they’re appropriate for your time horizon and risk tolerance.

        • gibmiser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          101
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Hey you condescending asshole, they literally changed the rules to allow this into the indexes.

        • Fermion@feddit.nl
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          75
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          401(k) is managed by the employer and you can only pick from the funds they have selected. That really doesn’t leave much choice for most people.

          That’s why people should consider doing a rollover into IRA anytime they have a job change and not just rollover into the new employer’s 401(k).

        • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m not even American and even I know that the level of corruption involved in the SpaceX IPO means that even people who want nothing to do with SpaceX had their investments tied up in SpaceX.

      • chocrates@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Man before Elon was a public figure it was so easy to fanboy. Reusable rockets is an insane feet of human engineering. At least now we have some competition in the space.

        I know that it was the talented engineers at SpaceX doing that engineering and huge publicity subsidies, but it felt like a step forward.

        Why can’t Elon just leave SpaceX alone.

    • Smaile@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      i monitor my father investing habits to make sure he doesn’t fall for shit like this, their have been a few times iv been worried to say the least…

    • hayvan@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s unfortunately bigger than just the suckers being suckered. These things also get pumped a lot by “early investors”, whose strategy is to get the stock immediately and sell quickly to take adventage of the initial surge. They increase the demand a lot and contribute to that surge.

    • TronBronson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sell side stock news is usually made to help retail investors lose money. They will pile on to this thing for a few more weeks then reverse it back up to 3 trillion. Rinse wash repeat. And you have infinite money generator 2.0