• OnyxRex@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    173
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I’m not dying for rich people that got power and decided to break literally every stabilizing thing in geopolitics so that they could make more money and then start a war to cover it up.

    I might die because of them, but there’s no way I’m dying for them. If they draft, I’m running. call me whatever you want.

    • Gordon Calhoun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      In totalitarian regimes—communism, fascism, religious fundamentalism—popular support is a given. You can start wars, you can prolong them, you can put anyone in uniform for any length of time without ever having to worry about the slightest political backlash. In a democracy, the polar opposite is true. Public support must be husbanded as a finite national resource. It must be spent wisely, sparingly, and with the greatest return on your investment. America is especially sensitive to war weariness, and nothing brings on a backlash like the perception of defeat. I say “perception” because America is a very all-or-nothing society. We like the big win, the touchdown, the knockout in the first round. We like to know, and for everyone else to know, that our victory wasn’t only uncontested, it was positively devastating. -Max Brooks, World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        communism, fascism, religious fundamentalism

        democracy

        Point of order, democracy is a mechanism for selecting leadership, not an ideology of governance.

        Democracies routinely produce Communist, Fascist, and Religious Fundamentalist leaders.

        Like, I know it’s a quote and all. But it’s just a Baby’s First PolySci view of how civilizations organize themselves. Not an ounce of Lockean Theory to be found.

        That’s before you get into the reality of Republican governance and practical enfranchisement. You can’t go rolling up on Thomas Jefferson’s slaves and announcing “Idiots, it’s a democracy, why did you vote for this?”

        • j_overgrens@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          democracy is a mechanism for selecting leadership

          No, it’s not. Or well, it’s more than that – especially ideologically. Quod omnes tangit, ab omnibus approbari debet – “what concerns everyone must be approved by everyone”.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            what concerns everyone must be approved by everyone

            Democracies don’t function this way. Majoritarian rule regionally occurs in defiance of some portion of the public citizenry.

            Depending on how the Democracy is organized bureaucratically, it may even be the majority of the citizenry.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        9 days ago

        Klinger’s problem was slow reaction. Had he acted before they initially saw him, maybe. My dad was drafted in Vietnam and always told me to go right up and deep kiss the guy taking names. Although I don’t think that would work as well now.

        • imadethis@fedinsfw.app
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          It would work, but only to keep you from getting drafted. You’d probably be in some sort of military brig for a good long while.

          Much more effective* is to shoot the bastards. We all know how much americans talk about doing it…

          *I’m not going to lie here, it’s not more effective for you, just for everyone else after a few more follow your example. You’d be consigning yourself to death.

      • ramble81@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        8 days ago

        No, it’s about sending a message that immoral conscription has consequences. If it means sacrificing your own life to send that message, so be it.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          33
          ·
          8 days ago

          “I became a terrorist and murdered an innocent person because I didn’t agree with someone else’s decision.”

          The draft will never occur in the U.S. because we already have way to many people in the military. They don’t need to have a draft.

          Now if we made education and healthcare accessible to everyone like we should, we might not have as many people volunteering to go.

          Our military would grow to like 10x the current size if we had forced conscription like Israel or Korea.

          We couldn’t afford it.

            • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              8 days ago

              So let me ask, do you think it would be proper to report this as a terrorist site. Choosing to murder a random person who has no choice to the military?

              • Diurnambule@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 days ago

                Hul didn’t you said theirs was no draft ? Try to keep ypur story straight little propagandist.

                • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  “immoral conscription” was the comment I replied to? Do you not know what those words mean? That’s called a draft in the country we are talking about.

            • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              8 days ago

              The number of “frags” near “U.S. commanders” is near 0. People like Pete Hegseth are stupid, but even they aren’t stupid enough to choose to go into an active warzone

          • Triasha@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 days ago

            We have an effective volunteer military, for now.

            When civil unrest reaches critical mass the elites stop thinking about the military as a tool to force other countries to do what they want and start thinking about it as a tool to force the rabble to stay in line. This is the primary purpose of most militaries in the world.

            The failure of the war in Iran brings us closer to that point.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            Remember when everyone said Trump couldn’t win the election*? And since when has not having the money for war stopped the US from going to war? They just borrow against their kids.

            Although I will point out that Trump and Elon bragged about rigging the election, that’s besides the point.

              • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                8 days ago

                If you think “it can’t happen here”, with regards to a draft, you’re an idiot who has their head in the sand. Too many “it can’t happen here” things have been happening.

                • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  It would bankrupt the country to add people we don’t need… It would be like a sports team paying to have 10x the players and not be able to put any of them on the field.

                  Creating a draft would drive voters to increase the pay and benefits of soldiers as well.

                  So yes it could happen. But it is a near 0% chance of happening.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        8 days ago

        Might wanna look up the origin of fragging, why it was A Thing and how the circumstances not only destroyed the draft, but the US presence in vietnam

    • Cypress@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      Of course never would i EVER frag a commandant of the New Reich in his own tent with his own ordinance, trust me bro! Why would I, a humble conscript, ever lash out at the fascist regime that’s rounding up so many of my loved ones for summary extermination? Golly that would be awfully mean of me, just too cruel of me by far, to return even the tiniest, barest fraction of the gut wrenching agonizing tragedy they inflicted on us all BACK to them. Goodness forbid.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    8 days ago

    Man, I did some light manual labor yesterday and I can barely stand today. I can’t go to fucking war without severely endangering every friendly around me.

    So no, 45 is not the new thirty fucking anything.

    • kibblebits@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      They increased the max to 42

      https://www.goarmy.com/how-to-join/requirements

      This is not a draft. Which is like 18-26ish typically.

      BUT, that doesn’t mean the draft is fixed at those ages. BUT, I doubt they would ever need to draft up to 42 based on the US population and the willingness of psychos to want to a) kill people or b) get paid to kill people via promises of a better life later as a veteran (Baby killer)

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        There’s the ones who like to shoot things, but don’t forget the c) it’s either join the military for pay or live in poverty or worse.

          • Rhaedas@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            35
            ·
            9 days ago

            Not sure where that came from, but tag me however you want. Might want to reread what I wrote that was agreeing with you and adding more ways people get funneled into service? Nothing I said was a promotion for joining anything. Also appreciate the subtle violence in the wish for me… wow.

          • athatet@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Chill the fuck. That isn’t what they said at all. They said it’s the reason some people do it.

            • kibblebits@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              8 days ago

              Do you think it’s okay to join the military and kill people for a government who won’t feed its people, just so you can eat?

              It’s a yes or a no.

                • kibblebits@quokk.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Do you think I should stop criticizing the government and the people who kill in their name just because it inconveniences someone online?

                  Yes or no.

      • BigPotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        I doubt they would ever need to draft up to 42 based on the US population and the willingness of psychos to want to a) kill people or b) get paid to kill people via promises of a better life later as a veteran (Baby killer)

        They need a draft once all those Action Hero wannabes get swatted down by Iranian drones and the Canadian troops start rolling in to annex the southern province.

        Who knew Fallout would be right about the annexation but wrong about which way it went?

        • kibblebits@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          8 days ago

          Haha annex. Love it.

          There’s a good line from the TV show, I don’t think it was used in the games. It’s in reference to a character that has to travel from Canada to the USA, and someone tells them:

          “don’t think of them as humans, think of them as Americans”

      • chocrates@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yeah, they will forcibly recruit anyone they want if their hold on power is seriously threatened

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      Most of war is getting things fixed or moving to the front line fighting. For every battalion fighting there is another fixing cars, doing laundry, cooking, or getting the paperwork in order for all of those. Doctors are just as important to an army as soldiers. None of those jobs is too much for a 35 year old getting 4 years of service in.

      Ageist nonsense.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        Nah we need the military as an option for poor 18yos with no job or education prospects after highschool. Which, despite the declining birthright, is still somehow a growing demographic.

      • Gordon Calhoun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yeah, it should be, but 18-24 y/o’s are much easier to indoctrinate and radicalize, as well as far more reckless in their tolerance for risky activities.

  • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 days ago

    If there’s a draft, I hope the MAGAs cry when their kids and grandkids get dragged off to boot camp.

    • devedeset@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 days ago

      A draft at this point would result in massive civil unrest. I’m pretty sure even casual MAGA people would lose their shit. The Iran war is already massively unpopular.

    • Cypress@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 days ago

      Whether to boot camp or concentration camp, this Reich has camps for all of us ._.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        Turns out that while fascism fetishizes the ingroup in it doesn’t improve life for them except a small portion of unexceptional members whom it elevates to positions they really shouldn’t be in

    • Prior_Industry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Their kids have probably disowned them and cut contract, so they might be happy they are off to war to become “war fighters” and get testosterone shots

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      What do they need to draft people for?

      They only need a few brainwashed children to fly drones from an air conditioned trailer.

      Empire of cowards.

  • xavier666@lemmy.umucat.day
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 days ago

    And here I was expecting that AI will allow people to be more productive and retire early. Man, I was so naive.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      No AI gets to make art and design systems which will leave us free to do the back breaking manual labor.

    • Billegh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Was? You think that AI is done causing problems? There are whole new classes of unknown problems waiting for us in the future…

      • qarbone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        “Was” doesn’t imply they think we’ve hit rock-bottom.

        They were naive to think “AI” would improve things, but now they are appropriately pessimistic going forward.

    • potoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      But at least it’s enabling child predators! Wait. Oh, no. Is AI actually a bad thing!?

      I still have high hopes it’ll help the environment, at least?

  • cloudshouter@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 days ago

    People don’t want to fight pedos war in Petey’s army so they expanded to recruit pool.

    Training will have to be different. I am already to fed up with crap to have a drill instructor yell at me. They can give instructions and support, but I’m not getting “instilled” with anything. Or maybe not. We see MAGA incel man cult guys paying thousands to get tormented at knock off BUDs training camps.