• tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    A diplomatic row has broken out between the British and Greek governments over the Parthenon Sculptures,

    I mean, it’s not really “broken out” so much as “continued for the past 200 years”.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The cancellation came a day after Mr Mitsotakis told the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg that the marbles should be returned, as having some of the artefacts in London and the rest in Athens was like cutting the Mona Lisa in half.

    “The prime minister was looking forward to discussing a range of topics of mutual interest including the Israel-Gaza conflict, Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine, climate change, as well as common challenges such as migration, and of course the Parthenon Sculptures.”

    The British government confirmed the cancellation and offered the Greek PM a meeting with Deputy Prime Minister Oliver Dowden instead.

    “Keir Starmer is clearly keen to ignore the contributions generations of British taxpayers have made to keep them safe and share them with the world,” one party source claimed.

    The British Museum’s Chair of Trustees, George Osborne, who is the former chancellor, has previously said he is looking to find “some kind of arrangement to allow some of the sculptures to spend some of their time in Greece”.

    Speaking to the Culture, Media and Sport Committee in October, Mr Osborne said any deal would have to see “objects from Greece coming here” for the first time.


    The original article contains 741 words, the summary contains 196 words. Saved 74%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Welp, looks like Mitsokakis squandered an opportunity for serious discussion for some domestic points-scoring.

    Just what the worlds needs now.

    • rainynight65@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So, a modicum of looking into the background of this renders the following:

      • These statues were removed from Greece by Lord Elgin in the early 1800s, while Greece was under Ottoman occupation
      • The legality and legitimacy of these removals is, at the very least, questionable
      • No watertight evidence exists to corroborate the claim of Lord Elgin that he had official permission
      • Greece has been repeatedly requesting a return of these statues since 1835
      • In 2021 UNESCO concluded that the UK government had an obligation to return these statues
      • Negotiations between Greece and the UK are ongoing

      Sorry, the only person who has squandered anything here is Rishi Sunak.

      • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        So this is your first time looking into this topic, and yet you feel confident to give out a strong opinion and feel smug about it?

        Guess what you didn’t do and modicum or research into? All the other more important topics.

        • rainynight65@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are you referring to all the other more important topics that the Greek PM wanted to talk about, but didn’t get a chance to because Sunak was being petty over an ostensibly unimportant topic?

          • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you can’t think of any geopolitical issues more important than some ancient statues then I can’t take you seriously as an adult.

            • Devi@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              What a fabulous explanation of your point. You’ll go far with that attitude. Maybe start by reading the article you’re ranting about?