NATO leaders are expected to call out China for its support of Russia’s war machine at their summit in Washington. However, they are divided over their approach to the Indo-Pacific region.

At their summit in the US capital, NATO leaders are not only set to approve a new military aid package for Ukraine, but also to talk tough on China.

In an interview with US media ahead of the summit, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg described China as “the main enabler of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.”

Antony Blinken, the US Secretary of State, told DW at a foreign ministers’ meeting in Prague in May that China’s support was “a huge difference-maker right now on the battlefield.” He added that for China to purport to seek better relations with countries in Europe while at the same time fueling the biggest threat to Europe’s security “does not add up.”

According to the US assessment, China is the top supplier of machine tools, microelectronics, and nitrocellulose — critical to making munitions and rocket propellers — and other dual-use items that Moscow uses to ramp up its defense industrial base.

  • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg described China as “the main enabler of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.”

    What a perfectly normal way to describe a war.

    It’s like when Confederates talk of the War of Northern Aggression.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Except in this case it’s accurate? It’s calling out Russia’s lack of appropriate casus belli.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      “War of aggression” just means a war that’s not in self-defence. “Aggression” specifically is also a term used in laws like the Rome Statute. This language is actually very well established in contexts that are not people trying to play cover for the Confederacy

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          So what’s your issue with it? Just that some pro-Confederacy dickheads use the same words?

          • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            No one talks that way normally. It’s the kind of talking that people use when they want to reinforce a narrative.

            When I hear things like that from our officials, I don’t feel like I’m being informed. I feel like I’m being trained to think a certain way.