In a court filing last month, Murray’s lawyers called First United American’s request to disqualify The Onion’s bid a “disappointed bidder’s improper attempt to influence an otherwise fair and open election process.”
Oh you know, just the usual suspects back at it again.
Can we just have something fun to tide us over for a while? Before you know, we get Trump 24/7 news next month.
It’s been Trump 24/7 for going on 9 years now… I’m so fucking sick of it.
When that orange shit stain finally kicks the bucket I’m throwing a party.Pls!
Of course they did, no good things allowed to happen in this timeline
Boo, don’t ruin the funny thing from happening
deleted by creator
government must not interfere with capitalism. oh. unless its for our side. then A-OK!
At the end of a lengthy two-day hearing in a Texas courtroom, Lopez criticized the auction process as flawed and said the outcome “left a lot of money on the table” for families of victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.
“You got to scratch and claw and get everything you can for them,” Lopez said.
…
Lopez cited problems — but no wrongdoing — with the auction process. He said he did not want another auction and left it up to the trustee who oversaw the auction to determine the next steps.
So it hasn’t been undone, I guess?
I make it about a paragraph or two on these sites. Ad playing, playing, fucking playing, at the bottom, the top, the side, a fucking interstitial breaking up the text…
So all I gathered is that there is a guy named Lopez who agreed that the process was corrupt.
Articles like that, are reasons why people only read the headline.
Might as well. They’re modern news. Back then you did news at a loss because it was the news. Now your news must make a profit. So whatever they’re telling us, it’s designed for them to make a profit.
It’s not real life they’ve got in there. It’s a GI Joe. A PS5 game. The newest Nissan. Product.
Judge Lopez didn’t say it was corrupt, quite the opposite. But he did think it was flawed.
I’m pretty sure based on the structure of the deal between the Onion and the Connecticut families this basically guarantees that the families (and any other creditors I guess) take home less money. Given the amount of money that they’re owed from the Connecticut judgement those families are basically 95% of the beneficiaries of this sale, and the original deal with the Onion had them giving up a huge chunk of what they could be entitled to in order to make sure that the Texas families (who were victimized in the same way but weren’t part of the same suit and got a much lower reward from a Texas court) got $100,000 more than they would have under the next-best offer. So in order for this to end up being a gain the next-best bid would need to either be so high that giving up $1.5 billion wouldn’t be enough to exceed what the Texas families would get, or else it gives the other bidder the ability to cut their bid to basically nothing and in turn reduce the amount that the Connecticut families forgo and the amount the Texas families take home by however much they want.
This is all amateur analysis, but short of rejecting the Connecticut/Onion bid outright for some reason I don’t think there’s any way that this doesn’t put the families in a worse spot. Instead whoever is behind the FUAS bid (widely believed to be Jones’s allies) may get to decide how much to screw the families over.
Edit to fix some numbers. What’s $1,498.5 billion between friends?
This is sorta a win win for the onion. They got some good content out of it for little expense.
