My economy is incredibly solid, and I’m not the most frugal. Could live off savings for more than a year.

Living in Scandinavia, background in physics.

That’s a fact.

Yes

I oppose “freely sent help” to a country/territory that opposes us in the EU.

Fair. But how is it Greenland’s or Denmark’s or anyone’s fault if e.g. France voluntarily sends support? Isn’t that France’s own fault?

Denmark demands nothing, where are you getting that from?

Any troops or military aid sent to Greenland were sent freely and independently by individual states.

What exactly do you think has happened?

What tax money? Greenland’s defense is funded by Denmark. If your country uses its military to aid Denmark and Greenland that’s not Greenland’s or EU’s fault, that’s a decision made by your government.

They are. It was Denmark who asked other EU countries to help.

Under the current rules, the Greenland premier isn’t even allowed to talk to foreign leaders without a Danish representative present.

In a sense, Greenland has no foreign relations beyond those mediated by Denmark.

What did Greenland do to piss you off?

That’s true - but Greenland’s defense is managed by Denmark, who is indeed a member of the EU, so your argument doesn’t really hold.

Iceland is part of EEA, so it hasn’t really rejected EU I’d say, they just don’t want to talk about giving up sovereignty.

This is a rather common misconception about sensitivity, it is only true under the constraint where you are unable to increase the amplitude of your measurement.

Aren’t there plenty of situations where you can’t increase the amplitude of your measurement? Isn’t that why we use SQUIDS for high sensitivity magnetic measurements for example?

Quadrature squeezing is great, but I don’t think it’s the only way (or main way?) quantum sensors compete with classical sensors.

You don’t. Any appropriately sensitive/accurate accelerometer or magnetometer is sufficient to do this.

There are limits to sensitivity and accuracy that can only be overcome by quantum sensing though. So yes, you’re right, but that’s actually the point of the quantum part.

To be fair, if you ask a doctor there is not much reason for drinking water beyond when you’re thirsty.

I think it’s a beautiful and surreal statement on how wonderful it can be to follow your dreams and become even what people tell you is impossible.

I think the guy in the boat is his father from the previous panel

Guessing it’s this: https://f-droid.org/packages/com.tristinbaker.idlefantasy

Many places you can get WHOIS privacy for free, like Hover.

I want any LLM I use to choose the very best, most precise words at every single decision point.

What a strange article. They realize that LLMs choose words based on chance, right?

There are beaches on the Danish west coast where the sand is plenty compacted, completely fine for driving. At least for passenger cars.

I would be hesitant with a truck, but seems to be going well.

Guess that depends on where you are. Many places in the world have very high social mobility along with solid welfare and pension systems.

Maybe somewhat less that 40 years ago, but certainly much better than the last thousand years overall.

It’s more that intelligence implies success rather than success implies intelligence.

Actual intelligence boosts chances for success, but it is not required for success.

Maybe they’re not native speakers

You don’t have to hit on strangers, the ideal person to proposition is a friend of a friend. So start by getting friends, then tastefully flirt with their friends.