You perhaps think less about killing people if you don’t have the tool designed for killing people.
You perhaps think less about killing people if you don’t have the tool designed for killing people.
But only when they moo in the proper french dialect.
But only when they moo in the proper french dialect.
But only when they moo in the proper french dialect.
And pushing the damage control to other people.
The biggest threat now is AI from dictatorships. I thus believe that it is in everyone’s interest to allow AI developments to utilize publicly available information, not ban it. For this, actually these evil bastards like MS and Google are a rather good selection.
If you sympathize with Nazi sympathizers, you’re probably a Nazi sympathizer.
They’ll say they just sympathize with Nazi sympathizer sympathizers. But then they are sympathizing with Nazi sympathizers. And so they are Nazi sympathizers.
Is that legal?
Just out of curiosity.
Hell, there are even news articles only quoting Tweets.
And TV shows only re-streaming viral YT videos. I imagine these people just watch YT the whole day and call it work.
As a person fed up with office culture, I’m wondering if it’s now my time to destroy my government.
Tips are definitely not the answer, but…
if a company cannot pay their employees a living wage without tips
Actually, where I live, we don’t have a tip, but companies won’t even if they can. The sad truth is that businesses won’t without pressure. They just call it a social problem, weakness of their country, whatever.
It’s a false assumption.
Again, I believe tips are not the answer.
Some compared it to the 1971 case of hijacker D.B. Cooper, who parachuted out of a plane with $200,000 in cash and vanished over the vast wilderness of the Pacific Northwest, never to be seen again.
Zero can be the maximum, technically speaking.
I mean, they can get closer but that doesn’t mean they’ll have the same market in the end. Even they will, they should not toss away their governmental structures in order to please businesses as the article indicates.
Give the money back to your Apartheid victims. That’s the only correct answer.
Europe will then become a gigantic organization that takes forever to take any action, with a fragile election system. There’s a reason why Parisians don’t vote on German issues.
According to him, the time has now come to unite and overcome the difficulties linked to fragmented EU regulations in every sector, which slow down the EU’s operation, particularly in response to emergencies.
I’d say what he wants is basically ignore member states for what he wants to do.
Speaking of the EU’s market potential, Draghi called it “too small”, adding that there “are so many markets and therefore the small companies that are born in Europe, as soon as they grow, they sell or go to the United States”.
And that’s because US is a big market. Whatever EU does, the tFrench market will not become identical to the German one, let alone Turkish or Czech
And just imagine. The next Hitler can get the most of europe by one rigged election system and start expanding from there, using the army from Germany, France, Italy, Turkey, etc. etc. It’s just dangerous and idiotic.
Edit: To whoever replied to me with what follows:
None of what you said makes any sense
No, I’m not going to waste time with someone who shows lack of the concept of nuance. Get out of your echo chamber first.
Just ban SNSes altogether, and that’d be net positive.
Do you even need an explanation
Me, not American:
“Who is this Ki…”
… Nixon.
“ok.”
“economic” toll