• 0 Posts
  • 52 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: April 6th, 2026

help-circle
  • A helicopter is extremely expensive to maintain and fuel, requires an extensive logistics network and has significant downtimes for maintenance, and it’s a pretty big target

    When you could feasibly build something at the fraction of any of those costs and use that. Like an actual platform.

    Again, helicopters have their place in the modern battlefield but you’re strapping toys to a Rolls Royce. I know the US has infinite Military budget because they starve the population of everything it needs to live but the numbers don’t add up lol

    And already land-launched drones can strike thousands of miles into Russia, why do you feel the need to strap these things to some of the most expensive gear you have when they’re already performing just fine without them? What’s the actual point?


  • Right. It’s cheap, which enhances a drone’s biggest strength dramatically (being cheap to produce). It’s fit for the environment it is in (contested airspace) and it is easily and readily deployed.

    Putting drones on helicopters is just… it is so expensive to put a helicopter in the air when you can just send up a platform or anything like it, even from the ground, for a fraction of the cost of one helicopter taking off. And losing a platform or a bunch of drones is infinitely cheaper than losing a helicopter.

    This is not me saying helicopters have no place in a modern battlefield. They do. But slapping a drone on it and calling it a day is lazy and dumb.