• CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. We need less people. In general, there is no shortage of workers, there is just inefficiency, bad working conditions and bad pay.

    The fairytale of “worker shortage” was made up by employers that want to get away with paying nothing for work and treating their workers like shit.

    • Sodis@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you want to shrink a population, you have to do it slowly while adapting the system to it. In a few years, with the boomer generation slowly retiring, Europe would be fucked without immigration. Too many retired people with not enough young people to care for them and uphold the economy at the same time. You can’t fix the resulting hole in manpower by only increasing efficiency. In Germany we are talking about a lack of 400k people per year.

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s not that we have too many people, it’s that we have an inefficient system based on exploiting those people and not providing for them.

      We could probably sustain several times the current population… just not with the current methods we use.

      • CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We could also just optimize efficiency and not make more people.

        Less people means more wealth, as wealth is a limited resource on earth we need to share it, if we reduce the shares we all have more. There is absolutely no need for more when less gets the job done as well.