• TheRealKuni@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I could very well be wrong. I’m not a constitutional scholar, only repeating what I’ve learned and read. Can you show me these contemporary sources?

      • TheRealKuni@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Right, those were talking about the ability of the states to be a check on federal power. Because military power would be in the hands of state militias.

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          M9stly referring to this, for anyone else who stumbles across this thread: “the Second Amendment was envisioned by the framers of the Constitution, according to College of William and Mary law professor and future U.S. District Court judge St. George Tucker in 1803 in his great work Blackstone’s Commentaries: With Notes of Reference to the Constitution and Laws of the Federal Government of the United States and of the Commonwealth of Virginia, as the “true palladium of liberty.” In addition to checking federal power, the Second Amendment also provided state governments with what Luther Martin (1744/48–1826) described as the “last coup de grace” that would enable the states “to thwart and oppose the general government.””

          • TheRealKuni@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Yes. A check against Federal power because state militias would be the military might. A “palladium of liberty” for those who believed centralized power was dangerous to liberty.

            Ask Shay’s Rebellion and the Whiskey Rebellion about whether the government would cede power when confronted by armed citizens (as opposed to state militias).