• jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    I literally don’t understand how renaming “Victory in Europe” day to “Victory Day for World War Two” downplays the role of allied forces. Also, what are they calling VP day now?

    • SeitanicMechanic@vegantheoryclub.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I literally don’t understand how renaming “Victory in Europe” day to “Victory Day for World War Two” downplays the role of allied forces.

      It’s… right under the headline.

      US president downplays role of allied forces in defeating Nazism, saying ‘nobody was close to us in terms of bravery or brilliance’

        • SeitanicMechanic@vegantheoryclub.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It doesn’t. It’s just how the headline is written. It’d be nice if they didn’t do it that way, but that’s the grammatically-recognized way of doing it.