The health secretary, appearing before two separate congressional committees, was grilled about slashes to disease research, maternal health and the U.S. measles outbreak.
That’s like saying he shouldn’t be expected to give advice on Seroconversion kinetics*. You’re right, but it’s also not really the point.
He, like your manager, is responsible for taking the knowledge of the “engineers” and turning that into practical advice and/or legislation for the public.
Which he is not doing… Which has resulted in a body count… Which should at the very least cost him his job…
But if anyone thinks that’s going to happen, they’ve not been paying attention.
*(I don’t know what that is btw, that comes from wikipedia. It’s some technical thing to do with vaccines)
Lol, that was maybe a bad example then. I was just looking for a technical term that the general public wouldn’t need to care about, but that all sounds like reasonably important information
That’s like saying he shouldn’t be expected to give advice on Seroconversion kinetics*. You’re right, but it’s also not really the point.
He, like your manager, is responsible for taking the knowledge of the “engineers” and turning that into practical advice and/or legislation for the public.
Which he is not doing… Which has resulted in a body count… Which should at the very least cost him his job…
But if anyone thinks that’s going to happen, they’ve not been paying attention.
*(I don’t know what that is btw, that comes from wikipedia. It’s some technical thing to do with vaccines)
Yes, that’s pretty much the 2nd half of my comment.
Lol, that was maybe a bad example then. I was just looking for a technical term that the general public wouldn’t need to care about, but that all sounds like reasonably important information
You give me too much credit. I got curious and started googling, lol.