You are in an instance prohibiting talking qbout boycott the only options we have to help even 0.1% the palestinians. Your instance prohibit educating people about the cancer called zionism the source of the problem
I don’t see you guys in posts about israel crimes but appear like a genie when zionism is compared to nazim despite both having the same rhetoric just different population they target
You don’t see to be bothered whem people get insulted for being in .ml instance
I believe that’s what some people who don’t like the instance claim. I’m pretty sure I read that, too. But I really can’t find it in the rules written by themselves. You can nit however say the state of Israel needs to be dissolved in the process, I think that’s banned.
Israel made it impossible for a two state solution to happen with all the illegal settlements. What’s wrong with dissolving Israel and create a one state solution where both can has the same rights?
You are in an instance prohibiting talking qbout boycott the only options we have to help even 0.1% the palestinians. Your instance prohibit educating people about the cancer called zionism the source of the problem
I don’t see you guys in posts about israel crimes but appear like a genie when zionism is compared to nazim despite both having the same rhetoric just different population they target
You don’t see to be bothered whem people get insulted for being in .ml instance
You really should read the original announcement of the feddit.org mods, because what you are saying is absolutely not what the rules there are.
Apparently calling for a one state solution where Israeli and palestinian live peacefully is prohibited
You can read the post here: https://feddit.org/post/12529640
There is nothing there containing a one state solution and also german law totally doesn’t prohibit calling for it.
And BTW: You have a autocorrect error in your post: “leave” vs “live” can lead to people misunderstanding your point.
The comment in that link that was removed called for a one state solution and was removes
I believe that’s what some people who don’t like the instance claim. I’m pretty sure I read that, too. But I really can’t find it in the rules written by themselves. You can nit however say the state of Israel needs to be dissolved in the process, I think that’s banned.
Israel made it impossible for a two state solution to happen with all the illegal settlements. What’s wrong with dissolving Israel and create a one state solution where both can has the same rights?