FUUU

Does anyone know of an ad blocker blocker blocker?

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    I saw this with firefox and ublock origin installed. Dismissed it and continued not seeing any ads.

  • Psythik@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve been using Firefox With Ublock Origin (and YouTube ReVanced for mobile) for years, and have yet to see this message outside of a screenshot.

  • rpa@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    I got this with Firefox + uBlock Origin yesterday but was gone a couple videos later, uBlock must have updated.

  • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Others have already weighed in, but:

    This warning doesn’t seem to be persistent. Using ublock/regularly clearing cookies seems to keep this at bay. Sometimes it helps to open new links in container tabs as well.

    I got this earlier this week and clearing my cookies/using container tabs seems to reset it.

    • Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      True aha. yt-dlp still works mostly, so I suppose I could just use it to download my subscribed and watch offline. There’s always a way

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        With or without cookies?

        I’ve recently been told to sign in when trying to access YouTube videos not just on a VPN, but now at my own residential location

        • Delta_V@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          you can add “–cookies-from-browser firefox” or whatever browser you use, to the end of the yt-dlp target

          • LWD@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’m personally just not that excited about needing a YouTube account to be signed in, in order to view/download videos. I imagine they wouldn’t take too kindly to that if they caught me. My existing account kind of matters, and apparently now you need a phone number to register a new one

            • bsammon@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 days ago

              you need a phone number to register a new one

              So what has worked for me in the past is: Get a cheap android/ChromeOS device (or power-wash one that you’re not using any more) and ensure that there’s not a working SIM card in it. When you power it up and it goes through the first-time-user setup, it asks you for your Google account, and provides you with the option to create one if you (claim you) don’t have one. Since there’s no SIM card, the newly created Google account has no phone number attached.

              I imagine that you could copy down the info about this newly-created account (after making sure it has a password and you know what it is), and then wipe/power-wash the phone/tablet/Chromebook and do the process all over again and create another Google account.

              Every google-OS-running device I’ve ever owned has gotten a new Google account created for it.

              • LWD@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                That is sneaky. I might need to give that a shot… Although I wonder if it’ll be okay with whatever VPN I sign onto first

            • verdigris@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 days ago

              Downloading a video is functionally identical to watching the video. I’m not 100% sure they can’t tell, but they certainly shouldn’t care… You’re not circumventing anything by downloading a streamed video, they just obfuscate the download functionality.

              • LWD@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                2 days ago

                I imagine they might care because advertisements are their source of revenue on that platform, which I believe loses money regardless. They’re also getting increasingly adamant about breaking people’s ad blockers.

                It also appears to me that every combination of functional use requires some form of identification:

                • If you’re logged out, they’re okay with you browsing from an identifiable home IP address.
                • If you’re on a VPN, they’re okay with showing your videos if you log in so they can track your viewing habits.
                • If you’re on a VPN and make a new account, they want your phone number so they can tie your identity to an actual human being.

                It might be a bit paranoid, but these factors combined suggest that Google does not want us to watch videos without providing some form of (inferrable) personal identification. And if Google can’t get what it wants, specifically data and ad revenue, they might be very willing to terminate an account that’s draining their coffers.

                • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Does it have to be a home IP? I use a 4G connection behind NAT444 and it works fine without logging in. My LAN is 192.x.x.x and my router is on 10.x.x.x which is on the ISPs network, then right now on 85.x.x.x as a public IP which is clearly shared between multiple other customers.

                  They would do this instead of giving out IPv6 addresses…

            • Maeve@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              and apparently now you need a phone number to register a new one

              🏴‍☠️

  • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Invidious or Piped.

    Use a public instance or self host your own. Pair it with Freetube and you can skip in-video sponsorships/ads.

    While YouTube has been making it difficult for these services to stay alive they seem to alway work around them.

    • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I use freetube without anything but the issue is that my VPN is blocked now, and a self hosted invidious or piped won’t help with that, right? I imagine I’m going to need some kind of split for the VPN, where some apps don’t use VPN.

      But even freetube is somewhat clumsy for queueing videos and proper theater mode without borders. Using Youtube is becoming more and more cumbersome lol.

      I wish there was a simple executable that pre-downloads and buffers my youtube channel videos and then just launches an optimized local web server that has good UX.

      • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        but the issue is that my VPN is blocked now, and a self hosted invidious or piped won’t help with that, right?

        If I’m not mistaken this is incorrect, when you self host Invidious you also must host their companion tool to help skirt around YouTube’s blocking system.

        https://docs.invidious.io/installation/#linux

        You have to run this command on the same public IP address as the one blocked by YouTube. Not necessarily the same machine, just the same public IP address.
        You will need to copy these two parameters in the config.yaml file.
        Subsequent usage of this same token will work on the same IP range or even the same ASN. The point is to generate this token on a blocked IP as “unblocked” IP addresses seems to not generate a token valid for passing the checks on a blocked IP.

        Documentation here is a bit outdated but I assume this is how it still works, just automated without the need to manually run their commands.

        • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Huh, thanks. I don’t quite understand it but I guess a token makes sense. Similar to how I can use reddit with VPN when logged in, but not without. I don’t even have a youtube account any more though since they forcibly degoogled me by demanding my phone number.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        We’ll get there eventually. Google will just have to finish cracking down on DRM.

        Brave will probably need to stop working before we finally put that much effort into it.

        PC plus HDMI capture device plus com skip. You can’t stop us but man you can make it painful.

  • Horse {they/them}@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    this happens for a short time about every six months
    if you haven’t already, make sure ublock is updated, then toggle “quick fixes” (if it’s on, turn it off, if it’s off, turn it on)

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 days ago

    You can block element on that pop-up with uBlock Origin, and it starts working again.

    If you can’t click anything, there’s a transparent layer still in the way, so you may need to do a second block element (click anywhere and the entire screen should highlight).

    Weird side effect is that the scroll stops working sometimes, but if you make the video full screen then back it fixes it.

    • brachypelmasmithi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      for anyone interested:

      the scroll not working is most likely due to the main container in the page (usually the <body> tag but it can be some other element) having the overflow: hidden CSS property assigned to it.

      overflow dictates the behavior of an element that has its content overflow past the parent element’s boundaries.

      the property can have four values:

      • visible, where the overflow is fully visible and allowed to extend past the parent element,
      • scroll, which clips the overflowing content and allows the user to scroll the parent element,
      • hidden, which clips the overflowing content and prevents scrolling, and
      • auto, which works almost identically to scroll

      most sites run a script that assigns this property with the value of hidden to the <body> tag, making the user unable to scroll the page.

      ive seen this behavior the most with sites that blast you with an unavoidable cookie banner which you have to click through to access the page. usually removing the cookie banner element is not enough to freely access the page, and so you have to additionally find which element has its overflow set to hidden and disable that property.

      i reckon youtube’s adblocker popup is doing the same thing, and coincidentally turning off fullscreen also runs a script that makes sure the overflow is set to either scroll or auto

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        It feels strangely vindicating when symptoms that just look like ‘a weird bug’ to my dumb ass actually make sense to folks who know what they’re doing.

        Thanks for the insight!

    • DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are a few browser extensions that force a scrollbar even on pages its disabled if you need to work around it.

      Though not being able to scroll down to YouTube comments should be considered a blessing.

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I got one 2 days ago, refreshed and it went away (FireDragon with ublock)

    It actually pushed me further, I now browse Youtube logged out and disabled every piece of tracking i could find

  • Vik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is this with Firefox + ublock origin? Things are still fine on my side.

  • salvor_hardin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I use pipe pipe on android, haven’t had any issues and works great. Freetube on the PC, works great!

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Woot woot, added that to my arsenal.

      Vanced, new pipe, free tube, tubular, pipe pipe, mobile brave, yt-dlp->jellyfin, laptop->HDMI splitter-> capture card +comskip

      The spice will flow.

  • verdigris@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    You just close the window. I’ve seen this twice in the last three years and never experienced any actual change – still no ads or even black screens where ads should be.