• BenchpressMuyDebil@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    I switched to a feature phone that has nothing to do with Android for calling (Mocor RTOS) because I’m tired of fighting Android for the moment. I keep an unrooted smartphone at home for online banking. Kinda extreme but that’s one way.

    • monovergent 🛠️@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Can relate. I have a phone with stock Android and a removable battery for anything won’t or I’d rather not have on my primary GrapheneOS phone. I only ever plug in the battery as needed and when I’m settled at the safety of my desk.

    • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I personally don’t know how a non-smartphone is better is terms of privacy. Can you explain?

      AFAIK, they have the same level of spying, just more restrictions and less features.

      • monovergent 🛠️@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Common vulnerabilities: Tracking by carrier, including cell tower triangulation, SMS, and call logs.

        Non-smartphone specific vulnerabilities: Lack of security updates. However, the data to be exfiltrated from a non-smartphone is limited. If it’s only call logs and text messages, everything’s already compromised by virtue of the carrier. So the level of concern will vary with your threat model.

        Smartphone-specific vulnerabilities: Tracking by apps, manufacturer, OS vendor, or just about anything that can take advantage of the smartphone’s computing power. More data to be exfiltrated if it falls to a security vulnerability.

        Smartphone-specific advantages: Can be run Wi-Fi only to avoid tracking by carrier.