abacabadabacaba@infosec.pub to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoEight US states seek to outlaw chemtrails – even though they aren’t realwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square175fedilinkarrow-up1851arrow-down117cross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
arrow-up1834arrow-down1external-linkEight US states seek to outlaw chemtrails – even though they aren’t realwww.theguardian.comabacabadabacaba@infosec.pub to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square175fedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
minus-squarejagged_circle@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoI understand. But I’ll take any climate improving legislation I can get.
minus-squaregallopingsnail@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoThis legislation doesn’t even do that.
minus-squarejagged_circle@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoHow so? The one in Florida banned all planes. Banning planes has a huge benefit for the climate. And encourages train travel.
minus-squaregallopingsnail@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoIt does not ban all planes, it specifically bans “geoengineering and weather modification activities.”
minus-squarejagged_circle@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoOh. The Florida one blocked all planes emitting chemicals. Importantly not excluding carbon dioxide a nd other GHGs
I understand. But I’ll take any climate improving legislation I can get.
This legislation doesn’t even do that.
How so? The one in Florida banned all planes.
Banning planes has a huge benefit for the climate. And encourages train travel.
It does not ban all planes, it specifically bans “geoengineering and weather modification activities.”
Oh. The Florida one blocked all planes emitting chemicals. Importantly not excluding carbon dioxide a nd other GHGs