fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 9 days agoBaldur's Gaytemander.xyzimagemessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up11.04Karrow-down19
arrow-up11.03Karrow-down1imageBaldur's Gaytemander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 9 days agomessage-square70fedilink
minus-squareCrankenstein@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up108·9 days agoThis is one of those “if you cut a hole in a net, it then has less holes than before” type arguments and I’m all here for it.
minus-squarechiliedogg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down1·8 days agoI think it would still techically be more hole since a larger total area would be hole. I would be fewer holes, though.
minus-squaregravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·8 days agoBut there’s more hole per hole
minus-squarePunnyName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 days agoWhat gets bigger, the more you take away from it? My love for a blue Dwarf.
minus-squarem532@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 days agoMore cheese -> more holes More holes -> less cheese Therefore: More cheese -> less cheese
This is one of those “if you cut a hole in a net, it then has less holes than before” type arguments and I’m all here for it.
I think it would still techically be more hole since a larger total area would be hole.
I would be fewer holes, though.
But there’s more hole per hole
What gets bigger, the more you take away from it?
My love for a blue Dwarf.
More cheese -> more holes
More holes -> less cheese
Therefore: More cheese -> less cheese