• Bman915@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I’ve worked as a first responder for a number of years, our county like many have an emergency number, 911, and a non-emergency number, i.e. 123-456-7890. We actually carry cards with the nom emergency number on it with us in the truck to pass out if a call was less than an emergency for people in our county to put into their phones for future use. We also are a smaller place and only ever have 2-3 dispatchers on at a time, so if the calls on the non-emergency line they got could be ‘auto-filled’ by the AI with the location, need, and everything and wasn’t tieing up a dispatcher that would be great. The main 911 number needs to ALWAYS be human answered. If the dispatcher makes the decision that it is non-emergent and transfers it over to the AI when they’re busy then great, but those first words you hear after you hit 911 needs to be human.

    • kyle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I design call centers for my job, we have an AI bot that can handle non emergency calls and what you said at the end is how we do it.

      911 calls always start with a person, and the dispatcher can make the determination to transfer to the non-emergency bot. Y’all get too many calls that aren’t actual emergencies tbh.

      Edit: I looked up Versaterm’s solution, CallTriage, and it’s important to note that the AI isn’t for 911 calls, it’s for non-emergency line calls only. The article is conflating the non-emergency calls with 911 calls for shock value.