• squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Let’s put it into math instead:

        Let S1 be the set of people who voted for Biden. Let S2 be the set of people who voted for Trump’s second term.

        S1 ∩ S2 ≠ {}

        If that’s not helpful, let’s try code:

        s1 = getPeopleWhoVotedForBiden()
        s2 = getPeopleWhoVotedForTrumpsSecondTerm()
        
        if (x for x in s1 if x in s2 > 0):
          print("There are more than enough people qualifying for for what I said")
        

        And lastly, to reformulate the sentence:

        There are lots of people who in 2020 voted for Biden and in 2024 voted for Trump.

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          hah, you looked up an intersection symbol, nice. And now I just cant help myself since you gave me that response…

          So of 152 million votes cast, you’d like to show a sample size of just 1 person or more proves your hypothesis? seems pretty biased against the null hypothesis.

          And your restatement of your hypothesis: “There are lots of people who in 2020 voted for Biden and in 2024 voted for Trump.”

          You are proving “lots” with > 1? thats just not what “lots” means in english.

          And I think we’re done here.