• CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    I wouldn’t consider it a pissing match. Iran suffered an unprovoked attack on their energy infrastructure, that scenario would call for retaliation from any nation. They appear to be walking a fine line of inflicting damages while attempting to avoid escalation to full conflict. Call it a measured response, I guess.

    • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      This isn’t a measured response. They notified Qatar and the US of the attacks in advance, they only fired 14 missiles, and 13 of them were knocked down. Also these missles didn’t carry any notable payloads. Iran did this before when Israel killed Haniyeh in Tehran and Trump killed Soleimani. This is Iran go to way of singling that they want to concede retaliation by intentionally putting out a weak response. They want to deescalate in a way where they can save face.

    • Bosht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That and the fact their initial response was ‘okay I’ll block your oil exports then’. Probably bigger hit than any missile strike could do.

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      13 hours ago

      ah yes, the completely civilian nuclear program that for last month+ was busy using up 5% enriched uranium (on upper range of enrichment in normal reactors) and 20% (usual in research reactors) to get 60% enriched uranium (no civilian applications)

      • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Iran was attacked here. No amount of “what about the WMD’s” makes the attacks on them by the US and Israel legal under international law.

        Iran had a deal that allowed other countries to control their nuclear sector. The US left that deal. Iran was taking part in negotiations about a new deal. The US bombed them. What has been done to Iran here is a terrible violation of international law, and a terrible violation of their sovereignty.

        • fullsquare@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          12 hours ago

          they were still a party to NPT the entire time, and they didn’t meet obligations of that treaty for over 20 years. NPT also includes inspections by IAEA

          say what you want, they can’t unbomb Fordow so any discussions about future iranian nuclear program are pointless

            • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Many. Yet they’re still justified in striking a nuclear bomb-making facility in a nation that has more or less said it plans to use it.