These are awful things, but again, you yourself mention “good faith interpretation”. This is a procedural problem with lawmaking in general that if you don’t specifically have an action codified in law that says “you cannot do this”, people will find ways to work around it. This is the case with both of the things you’ve mentioned, unfortunately.

Now, if the existing laws specifically had mentioned these things are illegal AND were in the constitution, and then somebody tried to enact them, thats a different story.

Instead these things exist because of bad faith interpretation of laws, and need to to be routed out by very specific wording or rulings.