• Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Reminder that Hitler lost the election. The liberals endorsed a conservative candidate in the name of unity, who won, and proceeded to staff the government with Nazis and made Hitler chancellor, in the name of unity.

    The left, cursed with Casandra Syndrome, campaigned on “A vote for Hindenburg is a vote for Hitler is a vote for war.”

    Because there is nothing new under the sun, you even had the liberals who announced their endorsement of Hindenburg immediately start attacking the left for not supporting their best shot at defeating Hitler..

    In the end, many of them did end up supporting Hindenburg. But liberals will always see the left as a greater threat than fascists.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Fascinating that “I wish we had elected the Nazis sooner” is tankie orthodoxy.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Socialism is the only way to stop liberalism from proceeding to fascism. If the liberals had supported the socialists instead of demanding the socialists vote for them while they create the conditions for fascism to grow, and then hand power to the fascists, we could have strangled it in its crib.

        It was as true in the 1920s and 30s as it is today. Hell we even saw the dems choose to fund ICE year after year, after they built the first set of cages, and right now, today, are choosing not to block its massive expansion.

        And you have any faith at all that those same people have any interest in stopping fascism?

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          If the liberals had supported the socialists instead of demanding the socialists vote for them

          Yes, if only the liberals, who make up a plurality of this country, had chosen to support the socialists, who make up single-digit percentages of this country, they would’ve won the election in a landslide and everything would be fine right now.

          instead of demanding the socialists vote for them while they create the conditions for fascism to grow, and then hand power to the fascists, we could have strangled it in its crib.

          As we all know, socialism has never allowed fascism to take root. So glad that problems have easy ideological solutions.

          But of course, what am I saying? You’re a holodomor and Uyghur genocide denier. You love fascism, as long as it has the right color of paint.

          • fkncowardz@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Lmao the worldists just spent years defending the genocide. There are still people saying Iran deserved to get bombed. Admin said Biden just had to send those bomb to defend America against big bad Iran.

            Hello pot this is kettle

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Yes, if only the liberals, who make up a plurality of this country

            Not even close to correct. Who are the most popular politicians in this country? Every poll I’ve seen in the past 10 years has AOC and Bernie at the top, and the only politician who can even compete with their approval ratings is Mamdani.

            Liberals make up a plurality of the news media and the wealthy Democratic donors. They aren’t plurality of the people. A recent poll has 62% of self identified Democrats saying they want new Democratic leadership, and only 24% saying they like the leadership they have. People are fed up, and they are not looking for more “centrist” Democrats.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Liberals make up a plurality of the news media and the wealthy Democratic donors. They aren’t plurality of the people. A recent poll has 62% of self identified Democrats saying they want new Democratic leadership, and only 24% saying they like the leadership they have. People are fed up, and they are not looking for more “centrist” Democrats.

              https://news.gallup.com/poll/656636/democrats-favor-party-moderation-past.aspx

              • Tinidril@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                Polling using the word “liberal” is pretty pointless. Leftists and centrists have completely different opposing definitions of what it means, and most Americans don’t have a clue.

                Polling on specific issues or particular politicians is the only way to get an accurate picture, and Americans, especially Democrats, are far more left than they self identity.

                • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  12 hours ago

                  Polling using the word “liberal” is pretty pointless. Leftists and centrists have completely different opposing definitions of what it means, and most Americans don’t have a clue.

                  That would seem much more to point towards polling using the word ‘liberal’ being more useful than trying to apply leftist definitions, since most Americans don’t have a clue about the distinction.

                  Polling on specific issues or particular politicians is the only way to get an accurate picture, and Americans, especially Democrats, are far more left than they self identity.

                  Funny that polling on specific issues and particular politicians rarely if ever translates into actual voting patterns, even in ballot initiatives. Almost like “Do you like GOOD THING?” gets positive responses until someone points out, rightly or wrongly, that there are other effects, like universal healthcare requiring minor tax rises.

                  Likewise, having a positive view of a politician is not the same as voting for them, or Bernie wouldn’t have lost two fucking primaries due to the more left-leaning of the two parties rejecting him by double-digit percentages in favor of neoliberal ghouls.

                  “THE COUNTRY IS SECRETLY LEFT-WING” is just as blinkered and fucking idiotic as “THE SILENT MAJORITY IS WITH US” from the GOP.

                  • Tinidril@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 hours ago

                    That would seem much more to point towards polling using the word ‘liberal’ being more useful than trying to apply leftist definitions

                    Who’s trying to apply leftist definitions? There is nothing in any definition of “liberal” that aligns it with leftism. It gets misused constantly in multiple ways, not to mention being confused with neoliberalism.

                    Funny that polling on specific issues and particular politicians rarely if ever translates into actual voting patterns

                    Tell that to Andrew Cuomo, or Joe Crowley.

                    even in ballot initiatives

                    Not true. Republicans (and some Democrats) are working hard at removing ballot initiatives because they work so well for the left.

                    Bernie wouldn’t have lost two fucking primaries due to the more left-leaning of the two parties rejecting him by double-digit percentages

                    Why would you assume Bernie being left is why he lost? Clinton had way more large money donations than Bernie, and she had corporate media in her pocket. Bernie wasn’t even making a serious run until he started doing far better than he thought he would. Half way through he completely reorganized his campaign to be a real candidate instead of an issue candidate. The fact that he was able to make that a race against someone with Hillary’s name recognition and the party blessing shows just how powerful left messaging can be.

                    The issue against Biden wasn’t that left politics was unpopular, it was that left politics was perceived to be unpopular. The number one issue for Democratic voters in 2020 was beating Trump. Voters thought a centrist candidate had a better chance, even though Bernie and Biden pulled almost identically against Trump. The media kept pounding on the electability argument against Bernie, and it stuck. Polling on the candidates showed voters preferred Bernie’s policies, but they didn’t know if he could win.

                    “THE COUNTRY IS SECRETLY LEFT-WING”

                    Oh, fuck you, that’s not at all what I said.

          • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Holodomer

            You are literally doing nazi propaganda right now.

            Uyghur genocide

            lmao I am in China right now, I was in Urumqi earlier. There’s no travel restrictions, literally anyone can go there.

            problems have easy ideological solutions

            Correct, because ideology guides actions. Decisions informed by liberalism tend to heighten the contradictions of capitalism; the working class get weaker, the bourgeois get more powerful, and the petite bourgeoisie get one, then the other, making them easily controlled by anyone who offers them a scapegoat that doesn’t question the system that privileged them.