There are more positions we need to vote for then just the one Mamdani ran for. Only voting for people who meet your personal purity test isn’t a useful strategy.
Harris refusing to rebuke Biden? Was a critical misstep. As was allowing the party to carry on influencing Republican primaries for the same “centrist” appeal. Picking up Megan McCain and Dick fucking war criminal Cheney endorsements and refusing to alienate them was not the way to retain the Left or Youth.
Obviously. There can be more than one lesson to learn from an election.
90% of your agrument is addressed to an imaginary neoliberal. All so you can larp about being so pure for only being willing to support one guy. We need more than the mayor of the New York to defeat fascism.
I will only vote for people who offer actual material policy gains like Zohran Mamdani does, Democrat or otherwise.
About Zohran Mamdani, say the words, Liberal: Vote Blue No Matter Who.
Say it.
Quit dancing around it, quit pretending this has nothing to do with everything else I’ve brought up in our discussion.
Say the Line, Bart.
Say it.
Because when all I hear is “vote blue no matter who” unpacked, without acknowledging him? Is Liberal Cope, from a meat-bot that cannot acknowledge the reality implied by the principles it spews.
No more dancing. No more trying to be clever. Say the fucking line, Bart, and be an actual person again.
I support Mamdani. I’m going to vote for the furthest left, viable candidates that I can. In most cases, in the short term, that’s going to be neoliberals. Hopefully all the candidates will be socialist eventually.
Your argument is fully committed to owning this neoliberal that you’ve invented. I don’t care about what other people think about me. I’m way to close to the chopping block to care. So I definitely don’t care about your views on this other person you’re pretending to have an argument with.
But you’re argument is an excellent example of how to be politically ineffective so I’ll keep dismantling it. People need to out grow this mindset of preserving their personal moral purity in order to be politically effective. Instead they’ll need to learn how to analyze what strategies are the most useful.
There are more positions we need to vote for then just the one Mamdani ran for. Only voting for people who meet your personal purity test isn’t a useful strategy.
Obviously. There can be more than one lesson to learn from an election.
90% of your agrument is addressed to an imaginary neoliberal. All so you can larp about being so pure for only being willing to support one guy. We need more than the mayor of the New York to defeat fascism.
About Zohran Mamdani, say the words, Liberal: Vote Blue No Matter Who.
Say it.
Quit dancing around it, quit pretending this has nothing to do with everything else I’ve brought up in our discussion.
Say the Line, Bart.
Say it.
Because when all I hear is “vote blue no matter who” unpacked, without acknowledging him? Is Liberal Cope, from a meat-bot that cannot acknowledge the reality implied by the principles it spews.
No more dancing. No more trying to be clever. Say the fucking line, Bart, and be an actual person again.
I support Mamdani. I’m going to vote for the furthest left, viable candidates that I can. In most cases, in the short term, that’s going to be neoliberals. Hopefully all the candidates will be socialist eventually.
Your argument is fully committed to owning this neoliberal that you’ve invented. I don’t care about what other people think about me. I’m way to close to the chopping block to care. So I definitely don’t care about your views on this other person you’re pretending to have an argument with.
But you’re argument is an excellent example of how to be politically ineffective so I’ll keep dismantling it. People need to out grow this mindset of preserving their personal moral purity in order to be politically effective. Instead they’ll need to learn how to analyze what strategies are the most useful.