schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@programming.dev · 8 days agoBugs Found in sudowww.linux-magazine.comexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: linux@discuss.tchncs.de
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkBugs Found in sudowww.linux-magazine.comschnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@programming.dev · 8 days agomessage-square7fedilinkcross-posted to: linux@discuss.tchncs.de
minus-square0x0@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-28 days agoThe vulnerability in question would’ve still happened if written in rust, it was not a memory leak. More an instance of feature creep, as the solution was to remove the functionality.
minus-squareComexs@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·8 days agoWould something like ‘doas’ have the same issue?
minus-squaree8d79@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 days agoI would rather go with a completely new approach like the one of run0.
So ‘sudo-rs’ guys were right?
The vulnerability in question would’ve still happened if written in rust, it was not a memory leak.
More an instance of feature creep, as the solution was to remove the functionality.
Would something like ‘doas’ have the same issue?
I would rather go with a completely new approach like the one of
run0.Rusty Bois are never right!