• Denjin@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Waterworld. At the time the most expensive movie ever made and the most spectacular flop of all time.

      • Flocklesscrow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        John Carter suffered from an awful title.

        “Princess of Mars,” would have resonated better with marketing. And is actually one of the book titles.

        • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I agree, but Dianey was desperate to create a new franchise. It was their response to Iron Man and the anticipated success of the MCU.

      • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Neither of those movies were really all that terrible. I enjoyed John Carter. But clearly they didn’t connect with audiences.

          • jacksilver@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah, I was upset they didnt continue John Carter, it was just a fun zany scifi movie. I think it was the advertising that killed it, but if they had stuck with it I think it could have done well.

        • beejboytyson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s the name and the power concept, all around bland and forgettable. Feel like that movie was a passion project of a book fan.

      • Babalugats@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I must be on my own. I know John Carter flopped phenomenally, but I really liked it. Thought it was a great movie. Was very annoyed when I found out that there may never be a 2nd. Even if there was, at this stage it is very unlikely to be the same cast. IIRC, a lot of the blame was on Disney marketing. But IDK about these things.

        • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Don’t worry brother, I still go back and watch waterworld. I like oceanscapes and post apocalyptic settings. Esthetic can be enough for me.

        • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          It would have been a great Sci Fi miniseries, and eventually a movie. They didn’t prep the groundwork for the franchise and casted very poorly

      • Denjin@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I did some digging and apparently Waterworld somehow broke even. I remember a lot of the hype around the film at the time was wanting to see if it was really as bad as people said it was.