• leftytighty@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      lol: me, an intellectual, gets into Internet arguments

      You: a mouthbreather, not taking time out of your day to disprove tired arguments

      100+ years of socialist and communist philosophy and nobody considered that actually human capitalist by nature though

      • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nah that wasn’t his point, I don’t think at least. I’m Def with you there, mr.communism himself Marx addressed this dumbass argument before communism entered the vernacular again in the 1900s.

        • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          By the principle of charity we can go with your interpretation.

          Kropotkin’s Mutual Aid directly covers this topic as well. Altruism is natural and occurs throughout our history, arguably cooperation is the basis of our civilization.

          Dominating aggressive cultures have attacked and eradicated more peaceful cultures, sure, but you can’t call one human nature and the other not.

          I guess I don’t see what the point is besides defeatism and playing in to the hands of those that want us to continue doing nothing?

          • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I too read Mutual Aid by Kropotkin.

            As he puts it in the very title: “Mutual Aid: A Factor in Evolution”.

            Key being a factor Not the factor

            At the time, most of research into evolution revolved around the idea of competition as the driving force in an arms race for resources between organisms. Obviously this is still true, though like Kropotkin observed, we also understand that there is harmony and cooperation both between organisms for each others benefit and in the broader sense of ecosystem equilibrium.

            I think it’s important to have such discussions anyway because any doubts must be addressed not via faith, but via critical examination, so that we find the more correct reason to maintain revolutionary optimism, it is precisely to defeat defeatism with a resolve forged in fire of scrutiny. That said, I think this is too heated and came across as an attack, I also don’t want to play into anyone’s hands, I was being needlessly pedantic, I retract my statement.