The Sapienza computer scientists say Wi-Fi signals offer superior surveillance potential compared to cameras because they’re not affected by light conditions, can penetrate walls and other obstacles, and they’re more privacy-preserving than visual images.

[…] The Rome-based researchers who proposed WhoFi claim their technique makes accurate matches on the public NTU-Fi dataset up to 95.5 percent of the time when the deep neural network uses the transformer encoding architecture.

  • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    If it doesn’t get used for bad purposes it is very cool yes. So no it’s not cool at all. It’s fucked.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      People willingly provide enough tracking of themselves already

      While this could have military applications, the need to generate a profile of the person you want to track makes this less of a concern for your average “carries a phone everywhere” person