• elbowgrease@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve always had a niggling worry that downloading apps from 3rd party app stores came with a higher risk of getting apps with viruses and spyware.

    any truth to this?

    • qyron@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not really.

      Fdroid is a secure repositorie and the applications are reviewed before being made available for end users.

      The repository is also highly focused on privacy and security and will warn if applications have security flaws or depend on non free services.

      As an example, I use NewPipe instead of the standard YT app and it has a warning it depends on non-free services.

      One other example I can give is Librera. It’s a very feature rich ebook/pdf/etc reader. At some point, a security flaw was discovered and the app was instantly flagged has having such problems and users were advised to not install it.

      • karlthemailman@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fdroid is a secure repositorie and the applications are reviewed before being made available for end users.

        Reviewed by who though? Malicious apps even get through apple and Google’s screening. I can’t see how fdroid can match the capabilities of those guys.

      • temptest [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        What is your justification for this claim?

        I use F-Droid as my main app store, and while I trust most of the apps on there and haven’t found any asking for permissions they don’t need, I wouldn’t claim any Android app store is more secure than the Play Store. This post goes into technical detail comparing the two: https://privsec.dev/posts/android/f-droid-security-issues/ - Note: emphasis in the conclusion mentioning that these criticisms may or may not really matter, depending on your threat model. (as an aside - if anyone here doesn’t know what a threat model is, determine yours before participating in any privacy community or you’ll just end up with useless paranoia)

        That said, I would guess that Play Store may have a higher risk of malicious apps only due to the fact that there are far, far, far, far more potential victims, and being the default app store, victims less likely to be technically experienced enough to notice false apps. So, almost all attackers will probably aim for the most targets and only bother targeting the Play Store, despite the extra challenges.

        [tagging @elbowgrease@lemm.ee ]

          • temptest [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I did make up my mind, and both I and the article both explicitly emphasise people to apply the facts it presents to their own circumstances. What you just wrote is very condescending and insulting.

            • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Well my intention was not to offend you. However, I still firmly believe that using a proprietary app store run by google is not as good as a app store that takes libre software as a priority.

              Sorry if you interpreted as a insult. I just don’t like when people blindly follow others. I am not sure if that’s some you are doing but its something I see a lot of. I’m not perfect either and I probably should work on my wording to make it less harsh.

              • temptest [any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s alright, and just to be clear, I do use and support F-Droid because I personally think it is better and suits my privacy goals. I didn’t mean to sound as if I wasn’t supporting it, just that it’s a bit more nuanced when talking about the security side: like almost everything in security, it’s more complex than one took being universally better than another.