Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have

    • Noja@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      How can you look at this and think it has anything to do with Gaza? It’s just completely unrelated art, wtf is wrong with people? And they got Zara to remove the images too lol…

      "Zara said the campaign had been conceived in July and photographed in September, before the conflict erupted in October. The company said the campaign presented “a series of images of unfinished sculptures in a sculptor’s studio and was created with the sole purpose of showcasing craft-made garments in an artistic context”.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Zara opened its new and largest “flagship store” in February in Israel. The company ia deeply in bed with Israel and the claims to their defense are insincere. The timing of that campaign was obvious.

    • Univ3rse@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      That ad campaign was not about Gaza, it didn’t even resemble anything close to bodybags. It looked like messy artists in a studio. That whole bit was much ado about nothing.

    • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Clearly they were upset they couldn’t get their models to look as skinny as the starving malnourished children