• MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    At some point, you have to recognize factory farming as a public policy decision rather than a retail choice

    It is both, and both affect each other. False dichotomy?

    a vegan community that satisfies itself with attaching blinders when they pass through the Bad Foods aisle at the grocery store is going to end up in the same place as the climate activist who only owns a bike.

    Strawmaning what being a vegan is. It is far from just turning a blind eye.

    The difference between the US and India is that if you go around trying to butcher cows in particularly devote areas of India, you’re subject to serious political reprisals.

    You know that they eat plenty of other animals right? If you go there, meat and animal products are a very big part of the local food.

    I can’t take these arguments seriously.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It is both

      It’s induced demand. Increased capacity invited consumption.

      You know that they eat plenty of other animals right?

      Per capita they’re heavily constrained. They have three times the population and one third the land area. They can’t slaughter animals to match US consumption patterns even if they try.

      That’s incentivized a culture of veganism as normal and virtuous, as a consequence. And it has allowed the population to expand to 1.3B without experiencing rates of malnutrition common to more rural countries (Kenya, Argentina, and Haiti, for instance) where enormous stretches of land have been dedicated to feedstock.