obvious reference to peeps dismissin llms for not bein able to answer spelling questions
funi fake-thing, cuz programmin is actulli preddi useful - one has to kno whad its gud for tho
secret funi: python is suuuuupr good at countin lettrs "strawberry".count("r") while current llms r not (largely due to their tokenization step, making them literally unable to count the letters, but they can still count occurances of words)
the funi could also be seen in a way, where the poster got into coding via llms, then realized thad this “coding” is actually not as easy as he thought…
anyway - i believe thad using a rule-based query-interpreation system (like siri or googles query-specific UI) with llms as a fallback gives much improved human-input-handlin-systems.
Sure, but those opinions are created by the fact that basically everyone is trying to cram ai into basically everything, regardless of suitability. Naturally there’s going to be massive backlash.
Also, note that python politely tells you in didn’t understand because it isn’t a lying machine it’s a programming language, meanwhile an LLM just makes up a lie.
Trying to cram AI into everything regardless of suitability is indeed bad. However, that does not justify black-and-white opinions. It explains them, but it doesn’t justify them.
A bubble doesn’t mean its useless though. It means shareholders think it’s much more valuable and profitable that it really is, and the value is mostly propped up by hype.
If there was a trillion dollar investment in python, that would be a bubble.
i kno peeps will get mad but imma comment anyway!!! u cnt stop me!
i think dis is kindsa real-… *vine boom* 💥🤨🤨🤨
dis funi got so many - like - sub-layers 🧅
observe — — — the layers — — — (if u care)
"strawberry".count("r")while current llms r not (largely due to their tokenization step, making them literally unable to count the letters, but they can still count occurances of words)anyway - i believe thad using a rule-based query-interpreation system (like siri or googles query-specific UI) with llms as a fallback gives much improved human-input-handlin-systems.
besides thad - i dun see much use quite yet
(i hope shareholders-chan is fine with thad >~< )
Are you having a stronk?
no dear lemm world user, no i am not having a stroke.
Fully agreed, this is a very clever post and people are just getting antsy about it because it threatens their black-and-white AI opinions
Sure, but those opinions are created by the fact that basically everyone is trying to cram ai into basically everything, regardless of suitability. Naturally there’s going to be massive backlash.
Also, note that python politely tells you in didn’t understand because it isn’t a lying machine it’s a programming language, meanwhile an LLM just makes up a lie.
Trying to cram AI into everything regardless of suitability is indeed bad. However, that does not justify black-and-white opinions. It explains them, but it doesn’t justify them.
A bubble doesn’t mean its useless though. It means shareholders think it’s much more valuable and profitable that it really is, and the value is mostly propped up by hype.
If there was a trillion dollar investment in python, that would be a bubble.
Removed by mod
Smorty just uses this communication style and they’re very nice and sweet and good.
water u talkin bout?
EIDT: i do not have schizophrenia, if thats what ur implyin…