• RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Now, several users have taken to the Firefox subreddit to complain about high CPU usage when using the feature, as well as express their disappointment in Mozilla for adding AI to the browser.

    I don’t think it even downloads the model if you never enable or use it.

    • no banana@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      107
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I love that people get upset that their CPU is using its resources when they’re using it.

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Reminds me of how some people get upset when their OS uses up all their RAM, no matter how much they have. It’s like they want their PC to be sluggish and unresponsive. Unused RAM is wasted RAM.

        • Buckshot@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          2 days ago

          Did a project several years where the customrr required that the server we delivered specifically for the project never use more than 50% CPU or RAM. No requirements about how fast it actually performs its intended function, just that it can only utilise half the available resources while doing it.

          • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 day ago

            Probably a bleed-over from the embedded side. Spent a lot of years working embedded control systems for NASA and DoD - bare metal systems, often interrupt driven - and it was common to have 50% margin requirements. They know those systems will grow over time, and they often have lifespans measured in decades.

            • Buckshot@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              That would make sense, i hadn’t put that together but they had a lot of embedded control systems. This was water treatment but entirely separate from the control systems but i can see them having that a standard requirement

              • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                So was it a government (state or federal) water treatment plant? If so, I can tell you how it happened. The government contracting agencies have boilerplate text they’re supposed to add to contracts to make sure salient requirements get flowed. They’re supposed to delete or tailor anything that doesn’t make sense, but the contracts people aren’t usually very technical. We had requirements flowed to us about password management and account monitoring, but no one logs into a rocket engine or a torpedo. When we’d point it out, they’d say “oops, we should have deleted that.”

                • Buckshot@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Not in the US, our water infrastructure was sold off in 90s but that makes sense. Was probably something similar They held us to it though so they overpaid for hardware beyond their needs and we forced the software to run slower

          • addie@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah, we have that with our customers sometimes. To me, an app should either be running full whack - maxing out bandwidth on CPU, disk, memory or network - or completely idle. Chuntering along at 2% is a bug. For the ones that put ‘monitoring tools’ that raise errors when we reach 100% on something, we set a Linux CGroup to throttle the offending resource. Takes longer, obviously, but not worth arguing with their network deployment teams 🤷 .

          • bthest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            That RAM is mint condition collectors edition RAM. We’re just storing it there temporarily.

            Don’t you dare fucking touch it.

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            My software does that anyway because I can’t be arsed with multithreading or a 64 bit version

        • Novaling@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Actually, I’m kinda sad that my laptop doesn’t get close to maxing my RAM cause I specifically bought another stick to make it 16GB. This was back when I was using Windows but now I’m bloat-free on Fedoora. I need to get into gaming on my laptop instead now lol.

      • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I want my cou to be idle all the time! Damn it why did I spend so much on a CPU only for it to “do work”? FFS.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      “I’ve noticed that my CPU, GPU, and power usage goes up when I run games. Valve needs to fix this ASAP! Steam is literally unusable!”

    • BD89@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Isn’t this enabled by default? And don’t you have to manually edit the config settings in the browser to disable it?

            • BD89@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              You mean that annoying shit they do where I’m trying to move one tab and it puts it in a colored square with some bullshit?

              Yeah there was NO WAY TO AVOID THAT. It straight up did that shit on its own. Like literally it almost magnetically attracted itself to the other tab to pull this shit. It effectively activates it for you this way whether you want it or not.

              Man even Firefox is starting to shit the bed with their decision making.

            • Kissaki@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              No, I haven’t used tab groups. At least not beyond an initial peek when they were introduced. They’re no replacement or useful addition to my vertical hierarchical tabs (Tree Style Tab extension).