• JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Lot offering up his daughters is a commonly misinterpreted part of the story. It was meant to show how far you were obligated to go to protect guests in your house. It has been twisted into ‘homosexuality is so bad it’s better to allow your daughters to be raped than let anything gay happen.’

    Either way it is pretty awful by today’s standards, but not exactly the way a lot of people want it to be.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Even that interpretation still leaves the whole “his daughters are just tools he can use to meet his obligations” thing. It’s values like this that the old testament was based on.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You got to remember that the old testament was written over a very long time. The books of moses were likely written over the time from 1200-400 BC, with different souces mentioning different time frames.

        So it’s hard to point to these as being one consistent thing with consistent values, same as it would be hard to claim that there were consistent values between now and 800 years ago.

    • ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Now it makes sense why in Dante’s inferno traitors to their guests are buried further than traitors to their kindred