• Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      At least dealing with some portion of the problem is a good start

      larger trash cleanup efforts are worthwhile.

      I’m confused, where did I say anything to imply otherwise? I stated that this particular device doesn’t filter microplastics, as well as that microplastics are a huge problem that needs to be addressed. Which part of that implies that larger garbage pieces aren’t worth cleaning up? After all, larger pollution breaks down to produce smaller pollution (which I also stated.) Denying large pollution while acknowledging micropollution wouldn’t make any sense, so I’m not sure where this argument is coming from.

      I’m reminded of that “Twitter” meme, where someone can’t talk about pancakes without people arguing that they must hate waffles. It’s just as absurd to assume that if someone is talking about microplastics, that means they’re fine with larger garbage.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        He was referring to the OP’s post that was worried about plankton because they didn’t read the link that was posted. He was agreeing with you.