• x0x7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I agree with the general point of this post. But FYI any city that has put serious money into housing the homeless has found the homeless didn’t get housed. No amount of money ends famine in Africa and no amount of money eliminates homelessness.

    So yes, having national guards stand on street corners all day is a very stupid waste of money. But you can’t compare it to a fictional amount of money someone just made up on the spot. Because anytime someone has made up a similar figure, and then gotten it, that number didn’t do the thing they said it would. So I don’t think anyone has shown they know how to estimate that number.

    • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      What a cynical take. European cities with proper social safety nets have addressed the problem very well, and while homelessness is at non-zero levels, it’s insignificant compared to what we see in the US. “We’ll never solve it completely” doesn’t justify not trying.

    • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Sure, if you half ass it but if you’re serious it’s a a soluble issue. For example

      https://www.weforum.org/stories/2018/02/how-finland-solved-homelessness/

      The Finns have turned the traditional approach to homelessness on its head.

      There can be a number of reasons as to why someone ends up homeless, including sudden job loss or family breakdown, severe substance abuse or mental health problems. But most homelessness policies work on the premise that the homeless person has to sort those problems out first before they can get permanent accommodation.

      Finland does the opposite - it gives them a home first.