Based on recent reports, YouTube is actively restricting access to Premium accounts created through VPNs and cracking down on users accessing Premium content across different regions. According to user discussions, YouTube now detects and blocks VPN connections when attempting to stream Premium content[1][2].

Some key impacts:

  • Users report being unable to play YouTube Music through Sonos speakers when using a VPN, with the service becoming accessible only after bypassing VPN connections[1:1]
  • Premium subscribers attempting to access content from different regions than their subscription face connection errors and service disruptions
  • The restrictions appear to be part of YouTube’s broader strategy to enforce regional content licensing and subscription terms

The crackdown coincides with YouTube’s increased focus on Premium subscriptions, including showing longer unskippable ads to free users in 2025 to drive Premium adoption[3].


  1. Sonos Community - Unable to play YouTube Music ↩︎ ↩︎

  2. Reddit r/VPN - Getting around YouTube Premium ↩︎

  3. LateNode Community - Why are YouTube users experiencing extremely long, non-skippable advertisements? ↩︎

  • floopus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The problem here is the lack of a current alternative. As others here have mentioned, peertube might be a future alternative, but I can not help but feel that only fairly ideological people like myself would be interested (in the sense of dropping youtube on privacy grounds). I can’t see “normies” moving elsewhere. That said, maybe a good alternative doesn’t require mass uptake. I mean Lemmy seem pretty cool, albeit I haven’t been here very long at all (like a day lol, although I have lurked for sometime).

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Nebula seems promising. It’s reasonably priced and because they charge money there are no ads. I can afford it while I can’t afford the amounts people ask for on Patreon. But I don’t know whether it can scale up while paying the creators enough and keeping the price to users low.

      • rollin@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Just had a look - $6 a month, based in NYC. Definitely better than giving YouTube money, for now at least. They say they have a 50/50 profit sharing model with creators - profit presumably is after salaries (including bonuses?) have been paid, so it’s not clear exactly how much of your subscription does in fact go to the video creators. Still, a better option than YouTube, if only to support competition.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You’ll come to see this is like the Donald for left wingers.

      Constant downvoting of dissenting opinions with no discussion.

      Linux shilling will be everywhere too.