An initiative aimed at boosting Democrats online offers influencers up to $8,000 a month to push the party line. All they have to do is keep it secret—and agree to restrictions on their content.
I wonder what is the purpose of this article. I mean political parties do fund influencers. Probably the only problematic part is the clause where they said this will avoid disclosure of funding. Pretty sure other parties are also doing this.
So why a long form article with so many details, while it could have been a small report on the discrepancies in the contract.
If this is about ‘politically funding contect creators’ which is ‘ethically’ wrong, then I want to see all other ethically wrong things happening in America reported in detail by media outlets.
I wonder what is the purpose of this article. I mean political parties do fund influencers. Probably the only problematic part is the clause where they said this will avoid disclosure of funding. Pretty sure other parties are also doing this.
So why a long form article with so many details, while it could have been a small report on the discrepancies in the contract.
If this is about ‘politically funding contect creators’ which is ‘ethically’ wrong, then I want to see all other ethically wrong things happening in America reported in detail by media outlets.
Genocide apologists such as David AIPACman are getting paid to shill for the DNC.
Others like Hasan Piker who oppose genocide are not getting paid.
Thanks for clarifying. I am not that aware about American leftist circles. I couldn’t make the connection.
A lot of this funding was for genocide apologia for the Democratic party
This.
I see. Now the pattern is clear. I was thinking, “I don’t see names like Hasan Pikar in this”. Thanks for clarifying.
But the article did not mention this point at all, right? They just published it, naming people, to stay away from controversy, I guess.