Alas, just as we’ve reached some small level of stability, some small level of progress, there’s a good chance all of this effort will have been in vain. What do I mean by this? Well, the Linux world is fragmenting once more, on several levels.
Alas, just as we’ve reached some small level of stability, some small level of progress, there’s a good chance all of this effort will have been in vain. What do I mean by this? Well, the Linux world is fragmenting once more, on several levels.
Sorry if this is your article, it this is just a not well informed or focused but of writing.
It’s all over the place on topics, somehow thinking that all angles and applications of one particulthing fit the mold of the intended topic. That is the antithesis to how: a) versioned code, b) release management, c) LTS vs RR releases, d) use-case specific anything works. It’s wildly missing the application of what to use where, even though the “desktop” is the intended target of the point.
It doesn’t define ANY target application , and just kind of nags on things the author doesn’t like, with zero specificity in the why/how of the what.
It’s just putting opinions out there as if they are fact, or even useful, without explaining anything about the justification for why the intended point is even being mentioned (the atomicity thing)
It’s just wrong in places. FACTUALLY wrong. It’s clearly about a single user’s experience, and not a well thought out wide field of thought as one would want if opinions are the topic at hand.
It’s just bad and serves no purpose, sorry.