opened it up and looked at only the first page and i cant help but think how the practice of Redactions to protect people that arent the victims should really be not acceptable. how can that be justified? its obvious use of political power to hide evidence against people for which the evidence exists. if they didnt want the evidence to exist, they shouldn’t have done the bad thing.
Predators shouldn’t be protected, and I’ll bet the redactions are corruption. The only reason I’d accept is if there was a genuine risk to their children if the name was revealed
Predators shouldn’t be protected, and I’ll bet the redactions are corruption. The only reason I’d accept is if there was a genuine risk to their children if the name was revealed