• ccunning@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I think the idea is that all parties would find it beneficial so they would be incentivized to read it:

      Leeds told Ars that the RSL standard doesn’t just benefit publishers, though. It also solves a problem for AI companies, which have complained in litigation over AI scraping that there is no effective way to license content across the web.

      • whiwake@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I imagine that when it comes to scraping data, the benefits of having the data far out away the risk of getting sued for scraping it.

        • Spooky Mulder@twun.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Not to be That Guy, but with kindness I offer a small correction: “out away” -> “outweigh”.

          • whiwake@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Thank you, I was talking to the phone and it did not know what out we were weighing.

        • ccunning@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          If nothing else it gets rid of one of the arguments they’re currently using in their defense at trial.

          • whiwake@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I hear you, and totally agree. I just remain a bit skeptical that something like this will have any effect as long as AI is making money hand over fist