fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agoIF YOU TAKE ENOUGH YOU CAN SEE THE PATTERN BROmander.xyzimagemessage-square126fedilinkarrow-up1600arrow-down112
arrow-up1588arrow-down1imageIF YOU TAKE ENOUGH YOU CAN SEE THE PATTERN BROmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square126fedilink
minus-squareNaz@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 days agoThat’s so many nested assumptions, lol: Assumption table Graduate student in academia Running a simulation for data For a conference Haskell The probability value of all four being true simultaneously approaches ≈0% Don’t forget the sheer, mind-destroying size of the universe, and its age.
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·2 days agoCome on, it doesn’t work like this. You can disprove the funny theory only if you give us an even more ridiculous one in it’s stead.
minus-squaremuzzle@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 days ago Don’t forget the sheer, mind-destroying size of the universe, and its age. Most of it is empty. The trick is lazy evaluation.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 days agoOur telescopes eats up CPU cycles fast, the poor blokes cloud server will come with an unsuspecting bill this month…
minus-squareLH0ezVT@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoYeah, it uses a simplified model unless you look too close. That’s how you get those funny quantum effects. Although, I have to say, great sativa, dude
minus-squareSupervisor194@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days ago Don’t forget the sheer, mind-destroying size of the universe, and its age. I mean, if it’s really a simulation, all of that would be… simulated.
minus-squareNaz@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-22 days agoI know; I’m just fishing out counter-examples and counter-arguments.
That’s so many nested assumptions, lol:
Assumption table
The probability value of all four being true simultaneously approaches ≈0%
Don’t forget the sheer, mind-destroying size of the universe, and its age.
Come on, it doesn’t work like this. You can disprove the funny theory only if you give us an even more ridiculous one in it’s stead.
deleted by creator
Most of it is empty. The trick is lazy evaluation.
Our telescopes eats up CPU cycles fast, the poor blokes cloud server will come with an unsuspecting bill this month…
Yeah, it uses a simplified model unless you look too close. That’s how you get those funny quantum effects. Although, I have to say, great sativa, dude
I mean, if it’s really a simulation, all of that would be… simulated.
I know; I’m just fishing out counter-examples and counter-arguments.