cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/48712513
Smaller vehicles that do not need to meet the same safety requirements as existing cars could be Europe’s answer to maintaining its automotive industry.
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/48712513
Smaller vehicles that do not need to meet the same safety requirements as existing cars could be Europe’s answer to maintaining its automotive industry.
Why do people not use the adjective form of China when it comes to China?
I’m quite sure it would’ve been “German threat”, not “Germany threat” or “Russian threat”, not “Russia threat” but for some reason it’s “China threat” not “Chinese threat”.
How come?
I’m going to say Tung Nguyen (the article writer) probably prefers writing China as in PRC (and ROC, possibly) rather than Chinese as in the ethnicity (covering cars that are designed by Chinese but not in the area)
That makes sense. I thought ethnically Chinese persons from ROC would call themselves Taiwanese. But if they think of themselves as Chinese too them it makes sense