• zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    What a total dick. Lots of people with high end PCs are all saying how it runs like shit, so what’s the next excuse?

  • DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Such a bad argument. There is no reason for the game to not support lower end hardware except for lazy development. Not a good sign for the future of borderlands. This is also the type of game that really sucks if you don’t get a locked 60 FPS. Borderlands 3 is still a laggy mess on my steam deck. Sometimes it just stutters forever. Constantly generating shaders or something. There is no reason for it to be that way and lowering the setting has almost no effect on the actual performance. This is 100% the fault of the devs. They are pushing half complete products to market not the consumer.

    Also as many others have stated, not everyone has $4000 to drop on a PC. My most powerful machine is a Skylake processor with a 1070. It runs most games fine, it’s just the handful of unoptimized unreal engine games that run badly. I have nearly limitless options to buy other games from devs who actually care about us poorer folk. A 4070 ti is like 800-1000 rn. Probably won’t even run this game well. This is in an age where we have had nearly 100% inflation in a few years. Most people can barely afford to buy a car without spending half of their paycheck. They should be trying to make their games work on older hardware now more than ever. Ram is cheap, there are some things you can work around. It’s usually not worth it to target low RAM devices, but there is really no good reason for you game to not scale well to lower end GPUs. You don’t have to have only 4k textures on disk. You can easily automate a process to create lower poly, and lower resolution textures, implement modest lighting systems. It’s pretty easy in relation to other things. Cpus are mid, you shouldn’t necessarily target 10 year old CPUs if it’s going to make the game worse but your game shouldn’t be so unoptimized that you need 5.5 ghz on a single core to get 60 fps. You should at least have a proper lod system in place so that you can support lower end GPUs in many cases where it’s not very difficult.

    The issue with many of these modern triple AAA games is they are trying to avoid as much work as possible. They are trying to avoid targeting lower end hardware because it’s a bit of work and they are struggling to finish their games. They need to plan for these things from the start and work them into their process.

  • Taldan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    There aren’t enough monster truck owners to support his game. If he gets his wish, Gearbox is going to lose a whole lot of money

    The reality is that it is a mass market game. It needs mass market adoption. Currently much of the market is locked out due to performance issues

      • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 minutes ago

        Can we please standardize a pc parts price point? (Not sure I’m saying this right)

        Like, “it doesn’t matter where technology is, $600 gets you ‘low’, &1000 gets you ‘high’, and $2000 gets you ‘ultra’.”

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    There aren’t that many Premium™ Gamers®, and trying to pretend that that is, like, a legitimate target demographic to pander to is just sad, folks.

    (The funniest gamer influencer backlash I’ve seen lately was against some YouTuber who blew ~$2K on gaming desk and a chair and called it a “minimalist” setup. People at large rightfully went “are you shitting me”.)

  • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I can’t decide if the explanation that “our shitty game is made for premium gamers” is more or less absurd than EA charging 80 bucks for a game with most of its characters still locked would “provide players with a sense of pride and accomplishment”.

  • Surp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Unfortunately it doesn’t matter what any of us say…the damage is done. I saw something like 200k online on steam. Unless most of them refund the negative reviews are meaningless. Pretend it was only 200k on steam and they bought just the “shitty” $70 version. …who knows how many bought on other platforms as well. They made a lot of money already is all I’m saying and I wish they didn’t. Games junk.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    it’s wild to me that there are people who still not only let this man talk be first place, but write down the shit that come out of his stupid face and report on it.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It’s more akin to trying to drive a semi truck with a semi truck motor but then something drops and there’s a ton of friction like an unintentional tractor pull. Even the best chips on the market display subpar performance.

    • Yupa@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Hell yeah! Recently finished Clair Obscur, now playing Silksong, and waiting for Hades 2, this year is packed with awesome indies!

      • C4551E@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 minutes ago

        Hell yeah indeed! Shape of Dreams just dropped too, and is awesome (if you like the genre). Incredible year so far.

  • zebidiah@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    …is he trying to promote the game by acting like one of its shitty characters?

  • Chris Lowles@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Randy looks at Borderlands 4 actually performing somewhat well critically and says NOT IF I HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT

  • MrJ199414@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    12 hours ago

    They toned down the humor, which imo wasn’t the problem they needed to write better jokes, and write better villains.

    The entire plot feels like an extra long side mission which is basically, “Go Rescue Lilith.” They have been teasing something “big” is coming and that they need to prepare for war since the pre sequel. We have gotten now two new main installments, two “tales”, and a fucking spin-off since then. Yet they still keep teasing this “big” thing. I wish they’d move the narrative along already.