• Why is just about everybody showing themselves to be a better leader than Starmer lately? Like, I know he’s shit but I didn’t expect him to be this shit, even Badenoch has been scoring points against him easily. There’s incompetence and then there’s “Keir Starmer a year into being Prime Minister”

    • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Because he’s a technocrat, not a leader. He might be good at doing one thing (he was director of public prosecution and his dad was a tool maker, did you know?) but it doesn’t translate into leading at the top of politics. Same with Sunak. Both very earnest at wanting to do the best for the country (as they saw it), but both also absolute shit at selling their visions for the future properly.

      Christ, dare I say bring back Blair?

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I don’t understand how he’s so bad at public speaking. Surely he had to prepare speeches as part of his job, yet he always gives the impression that thinking of the top of his head and has no prepared remarks.

        But he also has another problem which is that whoever is in charge of public relations in the party needs to be fired because they are beyond incompetent.

      • Womble@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Best way I’ve heard Starmer described is Blair without the any of the vision, charisma or political insincts.

      • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        If he’d take a fucking principled stand on something it’d be something at least. Horse may have bolted in that regard though.