• banazir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I generally have nothing but a deep sense of loathing for marketing, but I genuinely feel bad for the people who have to try smearing lipstick on this pig.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Is it really that bad?

      I’m not much of a fan of the series, but the complaints I’m seeing are in the “I only get 30fps instead of 60fps on ultra!” kinds of things that make me roll my eyes super hard

      • Anarch157a@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The eye rolling would be justified if the 30FPS was on something like a 3070 or something like that, but when the complaint comes from someone sporting a 5090, well…

        If the game runs at 30FPS on the latest, greatest top-of-the-line card from Nvidia, imagine what kind of performance people are getting from 4060s or RX6600s…

        A game that’s this badly optimised is a disrespect to all gamers.

        • ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Is that what the situation is? I think that’s also only the case on 4k with brutal mode enabled or whatever.

          Obviously that’s still not great if so, but I’d still put it in the eyeroll category personally. I don’t really feel butthurt if I have to run at 1080p or enable vlss or not get 120fps or whatever, especially on day 1 for a game.

          But I come from an era where there were games you had to shrink some 3d games lower than 320x200 to get a playable 10fps, so I’m also probably feeling some “back in my day we walked uphill both ways - kids today” energy here. What do I know.