• LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    18 hours ago

    You seem to be projecting your ‘scream-cry’ onto me, when all I did was give you the statistics you asked for.

    I’ll not hold your hand when you can’t click links and read, and I’ll not entertain your childish soliloquies.

    Type another inane dissertation all you like – I didn’t sign up here to be an elementary school teacher.

    • theUwUhugger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      18 hours ago

      You read the comment thread in which someone else posted links, but not my response to that… Superb

      Yea, dismiss my argument and do pretend that you didn’t read the exerts from the bbc article that delved into his presumed beliefs! Kinda happy you fuck off, you have nothing to contribute

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Sigh. My comment, my links.

        Here, I’ll post it again, since you seem to be a bit in need of coffee or something:

        Yes, statistically.

        Based on government and independent analyses, right-wing extremist violence has been responsible for the overwhelming majority of fatalities, amounting to approximately 75% to 80% of U.S. domestic terrorism deaths since 2001.

        Want to claim the government and independent studies are fake again?

        • theUwUhugger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          18 hours ago

          You think I am going to memorize usernames? And why aren’t you responding to my question that I posed to your brilliant argument? Why don’t you think that black people committed this crime? They are statistically more likely to do so

          Also, aren’t you the pup who claimed the one source I have been posting again and agaon is not from the bbc…? You are! Who is having issues opening and reading links?

          • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            Because I spent the time to give you actual information and you’ve ignored it. I had enough respect to at least notice who I was talking to – I’m sorry you didn’t have the same courtesy. I didn’t even downvote you, though you’ve downvoted me.

            Why should I respect your time and comments when you’ve proven you don’t respect mine?

            eta: and where did I claim your source wasn’t from the BBC? I said it was irrelevant and wasn’t the link we were talking about at the time. You’re clearly not listening at all.

            In fact, I’ve wasted too much time with you already. Don’t bother replying. Or if you do, enjoy shouting into the void.

            • theUwUhugger@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              18 hours ago

              I have responded to your source every time, its you still refuse to amswer the one question that point out how sad your argument is

              By far the saddest dismissal of an argument I have seen today is that I didn’t memorize your argument… Maybe if you stayed in 1 comment strand then I wouldn’t have an issue by telling you apart from the multiple arguments I am having on multiple platforms with multiple people on each! Welp, not that you had anything to add